Laserfiche WebLink
after mitigation,it could contribute considerably to localized cumulative stationary-source noise. A significant <br /> and unavoidable cumulative impact would occur because no mitigation is available to mitigate this impact° <br /> Project traffic would increase traffic noise along Grant Line Road,Mountain House Parkway,Byron Road, I-205, <br /> and I-580, along which existing noise-sensitive uses(residential) are located. According to the noise analysis <br /> .� conducted for the project(see Section 4.13,"Noise"),project traffic noise would not exceed County standards at <br /> existing noise-sensitive receptors for uses along most of these streets but would exceed standards at existing <br /> noise-sensitive uses along Grant Line Road(Grant Line Village,seven existing residences on the north side of <br /> Grant Line Road).However, sound walls are proposed under the proposed project and/or are required by <br /> mitigation in Section 4.13,"Noise,"which would reduce this impact. Similarly, sound walls would be developed <br /> by Specific Plan lI to reduce its traffic noise impacts, and it is assumed that,as required by the County,future <br /> ` projects that add substantial traffic to Grant Line Road,Mountain House Parkway,and other local roads would be <br /> required to do the same.However,traffic noise impacts on existing noise-sensitive uses is evaluated by adding <br /> project traffic to existing traffic volumes on adjacent streets, and mitigated based on the incremental increase in <br /> noise,rather than by adding project traffic to future cumulative traffic volumes and mitigating based on the <br /> incremental increase between existing and cumulative noise. Hence,cumulative noise on area streets could <br /> potentially exceed any feasible mitigation(sound walls)that may be required on a project-by-project basis. <br /> Therefore,cumulative traffic noise could exceed applicable County noise standards in the future on Grant Line <br /> Road,Mountain House Parkway, I-205, and I-580, and the project could contribute considerably to this noise <br /> because it would add a considerable amount of traffic to these roadways.A significant and unavoidable <br /> cumulative impact could thus occur with respect to traffic noise. <br /> 6.3.13 VISUAL QUALITY <br /> Development along the I-205 corridor has increasingly changed the visual character from agricultural and open- <br /> space use to urban use,thus altering and limiting the views available to motorists on nearby roadways.This trend <br /> will continue as future projects are implemented in the region,and the proposed project would contribute to this <br /> ,o cumulative change in views.As development proceeds in the project region as a whole,substantial changes in <br /> visual conditions would continue as agricultural lands and open space are replaced by urban development. <br /> Increased urban development would also lead to increased nighttime light and glare in the region and more <br /> limited views of the night sky. The cumulative effect of these changes on visual resources from past and planned <br /> future projects,as well as the contribution from the proposed project, is considered significant and unavoidable. <br /> Although these cumulative impacts can be minimised to a degree through vegetative and topographic screening of <br /> structures,use of outdoor lighting that limits glare,appropriate building design, and other measures,the <br /> significant and unavoidable cumulative impact cannot be fully mitigated.Therefore,the cumulative change of <br /> agricultural and open-space views in the project region to urban land uses and the associated increase in nighttime <br /> light and glare are considered significant and unavoidable impacts. In addition,the project's incremental <br /> contribution to these impacts is a significant and unavoidable cumulative impact. <br /> 6.4 SUMMARY OF CUMULATIVE IMPACTS <br /> As described in Subsection 6.3 above,the proposed project would result in significant and unavoidable <br /> cumulative impacts in the following areas: <br /> land use and agriculture—farmland conversion; <br /> transportation—impacts on I-205,I-580,I-5, and Altamont Pass Road; <br /> Sound walls would be required around all commercial and industrial uses.Loading docks would need to be enclosed,and <br /> landscape maintenance activities would need to be restricted to electric rather than gasoline-based lawn mowers and leaf <br /> blowers.These actions are contrary to many MHMP policies,including policies limiting the use of sound walls. <br /> College Park at Mountain House Specific Plan III Draft EIR EDAW <br /> San Joaquin County 6.15 Cumulative Impacts <br />