Laserfiche WebLink
s <br /> E 1527-05 <br /> USER QUSTIONNA RE, <br /> In order to qualify Bor one of the Landowner Liability Protections (LLRY) offered by the Small Business Liability <br /> Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act of 2001 (the "Broivnfelds Amendments"), the user must provide the <br /> following information (if available)to the errvi►-onrrierital professiotial. Failure to provide this information could result <br /> in a determination that"all appropritite irrq WrJP is not complete. <br /> (1.) Environmental cleanup liens that are filed or recorded against the site (40 CFR 312.25). <br /> Are you aware of any environmental cleanup liens against the property that are filed or recorded under federal,tribal,stale or local <br /> law? p <br /> (2.) Activity and land use limitations (AULs) that are in place on the site or that have been filed or recorded in <br /> a registry (40 CFR 312.26). <br /> Are you aware of any AU!_s,such as engineering controls,land use restrictions or institutional controts that are in place at the site <br /> and/or have been filed or recorded in a registry under federal,tribal,state or local lav?. � )D <br /> (3.) Specialized knowledge or experience of the person seeking to qualify for the LLP(40 CFR 392.28). <br /> As the userof the ESA,do you have any specialized knowledge or experience related to the property or nearby properties?Far <br /> example,are you involved in the same line of business as the current or former occupants of the property or an adjoining property so <br /> that you would have specialized knowledge of the chemicals and processes used by this type of business? riw <br /> (4.) Relationship of the purchase price to the fair market value of the property if it were not contaminated (40 <br /> CFR 392,29). <br /> Does the purchase price being paid for this property reasonably reflect the fair market value of the property? If you conclude that there <br /> is a difference, have you considered whether the lower purchase price is because contamination is known er believed to be present on , <br /> the property? NJO <br /> (5.) Commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the property (40 GFR 312.30). <br /> Are you aware of commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information about the property that would help the environmental <br /> professional to identify conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases? For example,as user, <br /> (a) Do you know the past uses of the property? �G J T J <br /> (b) Do you know of specific chemicals that are present or once were present at the property? A10 <br /> (c.) Do you know of spills or other chemical releases that have taken place at the property? NO <br /> (d.) Do you know of any environmental cleanups that have taken place at the property/? /L10 <br /> (6.) The degree of obviousness of the presence of likely presence of contamination at the property, and the <br /> ability to detect the contamination by appropriate investigations (40 CFR 312,39). <br /> As the userof this ESA,based on your knowledge and experience related to the pmpedyare there any obvious indicators that point <br /> to the presence or likely presence of contamination at the property? <br /> Completed by: _Date: lb 2 O <br />