Laserfiche WebLink
tI <br /> MOUNTAIN HOUSE PROPOSED AI.TAMONT HEIGHTS TENTATIVE MAP 4. ENVIitONMENTAI.CIIEc[cI,IST <br /> 4.14 RECREATim <br /> Less Than <br /> l Potential SPIHEIR Significant <br /> Significant Requires Impact Due New New <br /> Impact Additional to Mitigation Additional Additional <br /> Less Than Adequately Review:No Measures in Impact Not Mitigation <br /> Significant Addressed in Significant Project Addressed in Measures <br /> F1 Issue or No Impact SPIIIEIR Impact Description SPIIIEIR Required <br /> 14. RECREATION. <br /> F! a) Would the project increase the use ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ <br /> of existing neighborhood and <br /> regional parks or other recreational <br /> F; <br /> facilities such that substantial <br /> I physical deterioration of the facility <br /> would occur or be accelerated? <br /> b) Does the project include recreational ■ 11 Ll El 115 facilities or require the construction <br /> or expansion of recreational <br /> facilities which might have an <br /> adverse physical effect on the <br /> 0 environment? <br /> FjSETTING <br /> The Mountain House Community Services District(MHCSD) is responsible for securing <br /> funding,developing, and operating regional, community, and neighborhood parks in the <br /> hMountain House Community in compliance with the MHMP(San Joaquin County, 1994). <br /> At present,MHCSD operates one 5-acre park located at the corner of Wicklund Crossing and <br /> Historic Street in Neighborhood F. A second 5-acre park in Neighborhood E will be <br /> FA completed within the next two years (Machado Checklist, 2006). <br /> The closest regional recreational facility to the project area is the Bethany Reservoir Park in <br /> FAAlameda County west of the Mountain House Community. The closest regional park in San <br /> Joaquin County is the Durham Ferry State Recreation Area along the San Joaquin River east <br /> Fi <br /> of Tracy. Larch Clover County Park is located in Tracy(EDAW,2005b). <br /> SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS IDENTIFIED IN 2005 SPIIIEIR <br /> F', One potential impact regarding additional demand for public parkland was identified in the <br /> 2005 SPIIIEIR. This impact was found to be less than significant. <br /> F1 <br /> MITIGATION MEASURES IDENTIFIED IN 2005 SPIIIEIR <br /> Since the potential impact was found to be less than significant, there are no related <br /> mitigation measures identified in the 2005 SPIIIEIR. <br /> Fill <br /> 4-69 <br />