Laserfiche WebLink
E <br /> CRLF is federally listed as threatened. The.wetland feature on the project <br /> site would likely not support breeding habitat for_CRLF. (Habitat <br /> Assesssnent.page 8.) In addition,the closest-recorded occurrence of CRLF <br /> f is more than 1;500 feet away(Habitat Assessment at fig. 3);and the site is <br /> therefore unlikely to be used-by frogs as a travel corridor or for hydration. <br /> Further, under the San,Joaquin County.Multi Species Habitat Conservation . <br /> and Open Space Plan("SJMSCPs')jncidental take minimization measures <br /> for CRLF do not apply to the project area '. ` <br /> Swainson's hawk is listed as a California Department of Fish& Game <br /> threatened species Swainson's'haw ks:often nest within or on the edge of <br /> riparian areas adjacent"to"uitable foraging Habitat(Analysis page 9), but no <br /> active nests or evidence of.abandon ed raptor nests.were identified during <br /> EIP's May 2006 field sur4j. (Habitat Assessment page 12) Swainson's <br /> hawk was observed by EIP foraging withio one'"mile;of the project, but the <br /> wetland area does not constitute foraging habitat for.the hawk. (Habitat <br /> Assessment bage 9.) The applicant will conduct pre construction surveys <br /> I for Swainson's hawk consistent with the mitigation measures imposed <br /> pursuant to Specific Plan 111. <br /> i San Joaquin kit fox is federally listed as an endangered species and state- <br /> listed as a threatened species. The ruderal habitat'present on the site may <br /> F provide limited foraging opportunities for local populations of the kit fox, <br /> but the wetland areas on the site do not provide habitat. (Habitat <br /> Assessment page 11.) Moreover, EIP's May 2006 field survey found that the <br /> existing California ground squirrel burrows within the project site did not <br /> contain any evidence of suitable burrowing activity by the kit fox. (Habitat <br /> Assessment page 11.) The applicant will request coverage under the <br /> SJMSCP and comply with the measures in the SJMSCP and the Specific <br /> Plan Ill for the protection of kit fox. <br /> The rationale with respect to the third finding ("habitat of superior quality and <br /> superior or comparable quality will be created or restored to compensate for <br /> the loss") is as follows: <br /> The applicant will create or restore habitat of superior quantity and superior <br /> or comparable quality to compensate for the loss of wetlands as result of <br /> the project. Prior to the approval of the Final Map(s) for the project, the <br /> applicant will submit to the Community Development Department a Wetland <br /> Mitigation/Replacement Plan (Wetland Plan) prepared by a qualified <br /> + biologist. <br /> l 'The Wetland Plan will include the following provisions which are <br /> 1 incorporated as Tentative'Map Conditions of Approval. <br /> F a. There shall be no degradation of the habitat or numbers of any rare, <br /> �I threatened,or endangered plant, or animal species as a result of the <br /> project. <br /> b. Wetland habitat of superior quantity and superior or comparable quality <br /> will be created or restored to compensate for the loss General Plan <br /> Policy VI, G, 1). Replacement vegetation generally shall be native <br /> vegetation (General Plan,Volume 1, Policy VI, G, 15). <br /> f <br /> 3 <br />