SU0006254 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

t .3.5.12.A.2- PV y further ackno�uledges4that f?�t;dui "Other Junsdretion's" financial responsib}Ict es far el t Regiortai Roa war , xid ntt ed in the MHTIF Tebh6ibal,Report,'shall offset dtryst the Camrnunity ?evelo ,e b sEliYltty rfund r r _'.6th" ortati© :�Irn roveme `t In th 7Tui�scdi o Qy as 1 as o h �� `b }}fin y,1✓ j R - POD'S '� eNY.x? -42RT��ltsT "i $ "" "tnprg�rexnent fn the CQurity as s�eetcall1 ` � n theec � �he k diad t ;offsgt tl�escrlbed In tie I`echt call epof m ement tie mttt El �"Al, R � d d v tlae C©mrnuri ty Approvals Developer`a"'W W"lbdges that'Co'dpt is res of �,'£oc imlerxientatton of.the mitigatloii offset program as detailed In tete Teciea1F12eport Devlaper, , filrther aclrnowledges that;Counky may'amend the triitlgatibn offset program, irovicecl that tYi'e fair share hligatlons asset forth`In the;Techr lcal Report and Co nru�ttuty Approvals ate '' maintained: 3:5.i 2 A.3 The County a&ii wledges that when the dwelling u�nit tnggef point is reached for the Grant Line Road traffic Improvement described In Master Plan Talile 9 2;, (segm6nt frorn the County.line to 1--58'0 Interchange);the CommunityDeveloper(s�shall fund this transportation:improvement to the extent that the component of the MHCSD's reserved account for the Other Jurisdiction Feels insufficient to fund the Gralit Line traffic improvement The funding Community Developer shall be entitled to fee credits against the Other Junsdtction Fee, and/or lump-sum reimbursements 'from any benefiting Developers)pursuarit:to oversizing/reimbursement agreements with the MHCSD, to be payable by the benefiting Developer(s). 3.5.12-A.4. Future County transportation improvements, not yet addressed in the Community Approvals, may be added to the TIMF. The Community Developer shall be required to pay their fair share if subsequent traffic studies determine that the Community is contributing to the need for improvements on the yet to be addressed County transportation improvements. In addition, the fair share obligation for certain miscellaneous County roadways that may not yet have been established. These miscellaneous County roadways may be added to the TIMF provided that the Community's fair share obligation is determined prior to the inclusion in the TIMF and provided that the Community is required to fund only its fair share obligation for these transportation improvements. 3.5-12.B. The County agrees that the Community and/or Community Developers shall not be subject to any moratorium or other restriction on development permits because designated transportation improvements are not started or completed prior to a trigger point, specifically identified in the Master Plan and/or applicable Specific Plan, being reached, including those defined as Regional Roadways within the MHPA, transportation improvements within "Other Jurisdictions," or other undefined transportation improvements not covered in the Community Approvals, provided that Community Developer has complied with funding requirements as, outlined in the MHTIF, TIMF, and Regional Transportation Impact Fee(RTIF). 3.5.12.C. The County and the Developer acknowledge that, in addition to the MHTIF and the County TIMF, the Developer must comply with the RUF as adopted on January 7, 2006, in resolution R-06-38. Developer acknowledges that nothing in this section relieves the Developer of the responsibility to fully comply with the RTIF. wog-sF:FPD\s las l 1 as.2 -35-