SU0006254 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

01 1 4 Moreover, EIP's May 2006 field survey found that the existing California ground squirrel burrows within the project site did not contain any evidence of suitable burrowing activity by the kit fox. (Habitat Assessment page 11.) The applicant will request coverage under the SJMSCP and comply with the measures in the SJMSCP and the Specific Plan III for the protection of kit fox. The rationale with respect to the third finding ("habitat of superior quality and _ superior or comparable quality will be created or restored to compensate for the loss") is as follows: r7 The applicant will create or restore habitat of superior quantity and superior or i comparable quality to compensate for the loss of wetlands as result of the project. Prior to the approval of the Final Map(s) for the project, the applicant will submit to the Community Development Department a Wetland Mitigation/Replacement Plan (Wetland Plan) prepared by a qualified biologist. The Wetland Plan will Include the following provisions which are incorporated j as Tentative Map Conditions of Approval. w} a) There shall be no degradation of the habitat or numbers of any rare, threatened, or endangered plant,or animal species as a result of the project. b) Wetland habitat of superior quantity and superior or comparable quality will be created or restored to compensate for the loss General Plan Policy VI, G, 1). Replacement vegetation generally shall be native vegetation (General Plan, Volume I, Policy VI, G, 15). c) 1.02 acres of wetland will be filled as a result of the project(Draft Wetland Delineation Report Golden State Investments It, LP Property February 2006). The applicant small replace the lost wetland with 1.02 acres of wetland f a (General Plan,Volume I, Policy VI, G, 5; Master Plan, Implementation 7.3.6 (b)). d) The Wetland Plan shall be consistent with all Federal, State, and local regulations (Master Plan, Implementation 7.3.6(k); Specific Plan 111, Implementation Measure 7.3.4.3 (e)). e) The Wetland Plan shall show the location and extent of existing wetlands on the site of the proposed project. f) The Wetland Plan shall indicate sites that are to be developed or preserved to serve as mitigation for loss of wetlands as a result of the proposed project. To the extent practical, mitigation sites shall be in the Mountain House Creek corridor. If replacement in the Mountain House Creek corridor r7 is not feasible, replacement shall be within San Joaquin County. g) Provisions shall be made for maintaining replacement wetland for a minimum of five (5)years. h) Assurance of wetland preservation shall be by conservation easement or other acceptable methods. 1 In addition to the above,with regard to riparian habitat,the applicant will prepare a Riparian Habitat Mitigation Plan for the elimination of riparian habitat I on the site, pursuant to Community Development Department Condition of 3