SU0006254 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

1. MOUNTAIN HOUSE PROPOSED ALTAMONT HEIGHTS TENTATIVE MAP 4. $NVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST 4.10 MINERAL RESOURCES Less Than �- Potential SPIIIEIR Significant Significant Requires Impact Due New New Impact Additional to Mitigation Additional Additional Less Than Adequately Review:No Measures in Impact Not Mitigation Significant Addressed in Significant Project Addressed in Measures Issue or No Impact SPIIIEIR Impact Description SPIIIEIR Required 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a ■ ❑ El ❑ ❑ ❑ known mineral resource that would C be of value to the region and the �} residents ofthe State? b) Result in the loss of availability of a ■ E ❑ El ❑ locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan,specific plan or other land use plan? SETTING Mineral resources in San Joaquin County are discussed in the County's General Plan(San Joaquin County, 1992). The only mineral resources in the general area of the Mountain House Community are four quarries south of Tracy that produce aggregate for concrete. The County's General Plan states that natural gas is located in several fields under San Joaquin County,principally in the vicinity of the Delta. SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS IDENTIFIED IN 2005 SPIIIEIR The Initial Study for the 2005 SPIIIEIR determined that there are no aggregate resources within the immediate vicinity of the MHMP area. MITIGATION MEASURES IDENTIFIED IN 2005 SPIIIEIR Since the Initial Study for the 2005 SPIIIEIR determined that there are no aggregate resources within the immediate vicinity of the MHMP area,no mitigation measures were necessary. DISCUSSION REGARDING PROPOSED PROJECT a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the State? and b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? 4-52