Laserfiche WebLink
d) The Wetland Plan shall be consistent with all Federal, State, and local <br /> regulations (Master Plan, Implementation 7.3.6 (k); Specific Plan III, <br /> Implementation Measure 7.3.4.3 (e)). <br /> e) The Wetland Plan shall show the location and extent of existing wetlands on <br /> the site of the proposed project. <br /> f) The Wetland Plan shall indicate sites that are to be developed or preserved <br /> to serve as mitigation for loss of wetlands as a result of the proposed <br /> project. To the extent practical, mitigation sites shall be in the Mountain <br /> House Creek corridor. If replacement in the Mountain House Creek corridor <br /> is not feasible, replacement shall be within San Joaquin County. <br /> g) Provisions shall be made for maintaining replacement wetland for a <br /> minimum of five (5) years. <br /> h) Assurance of wetland preservation shall be by conservation easement or <br /> other acceptable methods. <br /> In addition to the above, with regard to riparian habitat, the applicant will <br /> prepare a Riparian Habitat Mitigation Plan for the elimination of riparian habitat <br /> on the site, pursuant to Community Development Department Condition of <br /> Approval #38 for Major Subdivision Application PA-0600363. Riparian habitat <br /> generally does not include wetlands (see Section 9-110.4 of the San Joaquin <br /> County Development Title); however, to the extent that the elimination of any <br /> wetlands habitat on the site is compensated by the Riparian Habitat Mitigation <br /> Plan, the compensation provided by the Riparian Habitat Mitigation Plan would <br /> serve as mitigation for the loss of the wetlands. <br /> 2. The Master Plan Amendment will not adversely affect the jobs/housing program and <br /> housing affordability. <br /> This determination can be made because the Master Plan amendment, although <br /> permitting the development of an additional five primary dwelling units on the project <br /> site, would not increase the total number of housing units permissible as a result of <br /> wastewater limitations in the Specific Plan III area. Approval of Major Subdivision <br /> Application PA-0600363 would result in the development of 53 single-family, Low <br /> Density Residential (R-L) units,whereas the number specified by Specific Plan III for <br /> the project site is 48. Under Specific Plan III (Implementation Measure 3.2.5.4 (a)), this <br /> 5 unit increase is allowed. Golden State Investments LP has not utilized 8 Medium- <br /> High Density Residential (R-MH) units in the recently approved Regents Gate <br /> subdivision to which it was otherwise entitled by Specific Plan III. The wastewater <br /> that would have been generated by these R-MH units is equivalent to that generated <br /> by 5 R-L units. As required by Specific Plan III, Golden State Investments LP has <br /> assigned this residential-based wastewater allocation to the project applicant, Golden <br /> State Investments II LP,who is a different owner,via an Assignment Agreement. <br /> 3. All applicable provisions of the Mountain House Development Agreement will be met. <br /> This determination can be made because the proposed Development Agreement <br /> incorporates provisions of the existing, principal Mountain House Development <br /> Agreement (Amended and Restated Master Plan Development Agreement by and <br /> between County of San Joaquin and Trimark Communities Relative to the <br /> Development of Certain Property within the Mountain House Community) and <br />