Laserfiche WebLink
I , <br /> iMOUNTAIN HOUSE PROPOSED ALTAMONT HEIGHTS TENTATIVE MAP 4. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST <br /> 4.1 O MINERAL RESOURCES <br /> I <br /> Less Than <br /> s Potential. SPIIIEIR Significant <br /> Significant Requires Impact Due New Via, New <br /> Impact Additional- to Mitigation AddiflofiA.- Additional <br /> .Gess Than Adequately Review:No Measures in Impaet Not Mitigation <br /> Significant Addressed in Significant Project Addressed in Measures <br /> Issue or No Impact SPIIIEIR Impact Description SPIIIEIR ".Required <br /> 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would <br /> the project: <br /> a) Result in the loss of availability of a ■ ❑ <br /> known mineral resource that would <br /> be of value to the region and the <br /> residents of the State? <br /> b) Result in the loss of availability of a <br /> locally-important mineral resource-. ■ t <br /> recovery site delineated on a local <br /> general plan,specific plan or other <br /> land use plan? <br /> S ETTING <br /> F Mineral resources in San Joaquin County are discussed in the County's General Plan(San <br /> Joaquin County, 1992). The only mineral resources in the general area of the Mountain <br /> House Community are four quarries south of Tracy that produce aggregate for concrete. The <br />' County's General Plan states that natural gas is located in several fields under San Joaquin <br /> County, principally in the vicinity of the Delta. <br /> r <br /> l <br /> t' SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS IDENTIFIED IN 2005 SPIIIEIR <br /> k <br /> The Initial Study for the 2005 SPIIIEIR determined that there are no aggregate resources <br /> within the immediate vicinity of the MHMP area. <br /> MITIGATION MEASURES IDENTIFIED IN 2005 SPIIIEIR <br /> Since the Initial Study for the 2005 SPIIIEIR determined that there are no aggregate <br /> resources within`the immediate vicinity of the MHMP area, no mitigation measures were <br /> necessary. <br /> DISCUSSION REGARDING PROPOSED PROJECT <br /> a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to <br /> the region and the residents of the State? <br /> and <br /> b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site <br /> delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? <br /> F <br /> 4-52 <br />