Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> Fi, <br /> MOUNTAIN HOUSE PROPOSED ALTAMONT HEIGHTS TENTATIVE MAP 4. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST <br /> 4.14 RECREATION <br /> hi <br /> FLess Than <br /> 1 Potential SPII[EIR Significant <br /> Significant Requires Impact Due New New <br /> ^ Impact Additional to Mitigation Additional Additional <br /> !it Less Than Adequately Review:No Measures in Impact Not Mitigation <br /> Significant Addressed in Significant Project Addressed in Measures <br /> Issue or No Impact SPIIIEIR Impact Description SPIUEIR Required <br /> 14. RECREATION. <br /> a) Would the project increase the use ■ L <br /> of existing neighborhood and <br /> regional parks or other recreational <br /> Fj facilities such that substantial <br /> physical deterioration of the facility <br /> would occur or be accelerated? <br /> b) Does the project include recreational ■ Ll ❑ ❑ <br /> ri facilities or require the construction <br /> or expansion of recreational <br /> facilities which might have an <br /> adverse physical effect on the <br /> Fj environment? <br /> FiSETTING <br /> The Mountain House Community Services District(MHCSD)is responsible for securing <br /> funding,developing, and operating regional, community, and neighborhood parks in the <br /> Fj Mountain House Community in compliance with the MHMP (San Joaquin County, 1994). <br /> At present,MHCSD operates one 5-acre park located at the corner of Wicklund Crossing and <br /> Historic Street in Neighborhood F. A second 5-acre park in Neighborhood E will be <br /> Ficompleted within the next two years(Machado Checklist,2006). <br /> The closest regional recreational facility to the project area is the Bethany Reservoir Park in <br /> F1Alameda County west of the Mountain House Community. The closest regional park in San <br /> Joaquin County is the Durham Ferry State Recreation Area along the San Joaquin River east <br /> of Tracy. Larch Clover County Park is located in Tracy(EDAW,2005b). <br /> SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS IDENTIFIED IN 2005 SPIIIEIR <br /> One potential impact regarding additional demand for public parkland was identified in the <br /> 2005 SPIIIEIR. This impact was found to be less than significant. <br /> MITIGATION MEASURES IDENTIFIED IN 2005 SPIIIEIR <br /> Since the potential impact was found to be less than significant, there are no related <br /> mitigation measures identified in the 2005 SPIIIEIR. <br /> j <br /> F! <br /> Fi 4-69 <br />