Laserfiche WebLink
MOUNTAIN HOUSE PROPOSED ALTAMONT HEIGHTS TENTATIVE MAP 4. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST <br /> 4-10 MINERAL RESOURCES <br /> Less Than ' r <br /> Y Potential; SPIIIEIR Significant. <br /> Significant Requires' Impact Due New 4 s.r .New <br /> Impact Additional to Mitiiation Additional Additional 4 <br /> Less Than Adequately Review:No Measures io Impact Not Mitigation ] <br /> Significant Addressed in Significant- Project Addressed in Measures <br /> Issue orNolmpact SPIHEIR Impact Descriptions SI'l1IEIR'''' Required <br /> 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would <br /> the project. <br /> r a) Result in the loss of availability of a ■ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ <br /> known mineral resource that would Ll <br /> be of value to the region and the <br /> residents of the State? <br /> b) Result in the loss of availability ofa ■ Ll ❑ F1 Lllocally-important mineral resource- <br /> recovery site delineated on a local <br /> general plan,specific plan or other <br /> land use plan? <br /> SETTING <br /> Mineral resources in San Joaquin County are discussed in the County's General Plan(San <br /> Joaquin County, 1992). The only mineral resources in the general area of the Mountain <br /> House Community are four quarries south of Tracy that produce aggregate for concrete_ The <br /> County's General Pian states that natural gas is located in several fields under San Joaquin <br /> County, principally in the vicinity of the Delta. <br /> i <br /> SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS IDENTIFIED IN 20115 SPIIIEIR <br /> i <br /> The Initial Study for the 2005 SPIIIEIR determined that there are no aggregate resources <br /> within the immediate vicinity of the MHMP area. <br /> MITIGATION MEASURES IDENTIFIED IN 2005 SPIIIEIR <br /> Since the Initial Study for the 2005 SPIIIEIR determined that there are no aggregate <br /> resources within`the immediate vicinity of the MHMP area,no mitigation measures were <br /> necessary. <br /> DISCUSSION REGARDING PROPOSED PROJECT <br /> a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to <br /> the region and the residents of the State? <br /> and <br /> b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site <br /> delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? <br /> 4-52 <br />