My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0006256
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
G
>
GRANT LINE
>
20058
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0600433
>
SU0006256
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/13/2019 1:55:06 PM
Creation date
9/5/2019 10:47:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0006256
PE
2620
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0600433
STREET_NUMBER
20058
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
GRANT LINE
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MOUNTAIN HOUSE
APN
20907026
ENTERED_DATE
9/15/2006 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
20058 W GRANT LINE RD
RECEIVED_DATE
9/12/2006 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\G\GRANT LINE\20058\PA-0600433\SU0006256\CDD OK.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1073
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MOUNTAIN HOUSE PROPOSED ALTAMONT HFIGH'€'S TENTATIVE MAP 4. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST <br /> 4.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS <br /> c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as <br /> a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral <br /> spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? <br /> The proposed project is not located in an unstable geologic unit. As stated in the discussion <br /> of Item a)above, the potential for landslides and liquefaction at the site are considered <br /> remote, and construction of the proposed project would not change these conditions. . <br /> Following construction of the proposed project, the site would slope down gradually from <br /> east to west at less than four percent, with the exception of Court B. Court B would slope <br /> down to the north at 4.6 percent so the adjoining lots would be at lower elevations than the <br /> rest of the site. Retaining walls, varying in height from four to seven feet, would be installed <br /> along the north and west boundaries of the site. A retaining wall four feet high or less would <br /> be installed along a portion of the southern boundary of the project site, and a retaining wall <br /> three feet high or less would be installed along the southern boundary of flag Lot 50. There <br /> would be little chance of lateral spreading or subsidence provided the engineered fills are <br /> compacted to the appropriate relative compaction. The geological and soils impacts of <br /> constructing the proposed project would be less than significant. <br /> Mitigation Measures <br /> No mitigation measures are required. <br /> d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code <br /> (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? <br /> The soils at the project site are expansive. The term generally applies to any soil that has a <br /> potential for swelling with seasonal or man-made increases in moisture content. These soils <br /> also have a potential to shrink or settle due to decreases in moisture content or drying of the <br /> soil (Kleinfelder, 2006). Unless properly mitigated, soil expansion has the potential to cause <br /> cracks in concrete floor slabs and foundations and exterior walls of masonry buildings as well <br /> as wavy surfaces along sidewalks and streets. Given the extensive cut and fill and the <br /> construction of retaining walls which are proposed for the project,proper design and <br /> construction to accommodate the presence of expansive soils will be important. <br /> Methods of controlling expansive soils include constructing post-tensioned slab foundations, <br /> moisture conditioning of soils prior to construction, or replacement of.expansive clay soils <br /> with non-expansive fill. Positive site drainage should be provided away from building pads <br /> and pavement areas toward drop inlets or other drainage devices(Kleinfelder, 2006). A <br /> geotechnical engineer and a structural engineer(not a civil engineer) should evaluate each <br /> area of the project site during design and construction to determine the appropriate option for <br /> expansive soil control. If the recommendations of the engineers are followed, the impacts of <br /> expansive soils would be less than significant. <br /> Mitigation Measures <br /> No mitigation measures are required. <br /> 4-32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.