Laserfiche WebLink
MOUNTAIN HOUSE PROPOSED ALTAMONT HEIGHTSTENTATIVE MAP 4. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST <br /> 4.10 MINERAL RESOURCES <br /> Less,Than x� <br /> s Potential,+ SPIIIEIR Significant <br /> Significaut RequiresImpact Due New New <br /> Impact Additionai `to Midiation Addilio.'al , 'Additional <br /> Less Than Adequately Review:No Measures in luipact NM Mitigation <br /> I Significant Addressed in Significant Peoject Addressed in Measures <br /> f <br /> Issue er No lmpact SPIIIEIR Impact Desciiption '�SPIIIEIR'- ".Required <br /> 10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would <br /> the project: <br /> a) Result in the lass of availability of a ■ F1 ❑ <br /> known mineral resource that would <br /> be of value to the region and the <br /> i residents of the State? <br /> b) .Result in the loss of availability of a ■ Ll ❑ ❑'V <br /> locally-important mineral resource- <br /> recovery site delineated on a local <br /> general plan,specific plan or other <br /> land use plan? <br /> SETTING <br /> Mineral resources in San Joaquin County are discussed in the County's General Plan(San <br /> Joaquin County, 1992). The only mineral resources in the general area of the Mountain <br /> House Community are four quarries south of Tracy that produce aggregate for concrete. The <br /> County's General Plan states that natural gas is located in several fields under San Joaquin <br /> County, principally in the vicinity of the Delta. <br /> SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS IDENTIFIED IN 2005 SPIIIEIR <br /> The Initial Study for the 2005 SPIIIEIR determined that there are no aggregate resources <br /> f within the immediate vicinity of the MHMP area. <br /> r <br /> MITIGATION MEASURES IDENTIFIED IN 2005 SPIIIEIR <br /> Since the Initial Study for the 2005 SPIIIEIR determined that there are no aggregate <br /> resources within'the immediate vicinity of the MHMP area, no mitigation measures were <br /> necessary. <br /> DISCUSSION REGARDING PROPOSED PROJECT <br /> a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that Mould be of value to <br /> the region and the residents of the State? <br /> and <br /> b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site <br /> delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? <br /> R' <br /> 4-52 <br />