Laserfiche WebLink
S = Sufficient <br /> 1 = Insufficient <br /> S I 6.0 PERCOLATION TEST INFORMATION SECTION <br /> K ❑ 6.1 Sit Bjal Showing th a i with concise and accurate dimensions of the percolation test holes on the parcel. <br /> ® ❑ 6.2 The iniJrr�ym number of sh ow and deep percolation tests was performed for each parcel. <br /> ❑ 6.3 De cription of the date,time and protocol used to prepare the test hole, including depth and dimensions of hole, <br /> preparation of hole, and depth of water used to presoak(minimum 12 inche(*6i—) <br /> ❑ 6.4 Description of the date,time and condits'on of the test hole after the 24-hour soak period (hole still intact, hole dry, <br /> depth to water remaining in hole, at Y ?F> <br /> ❑ 6.5 The test co����ttttformed to SJC Policy E 02 02(correct depth, diameter, 2"gravel,6"water refill, correct readings <br /> recorded�a �� <br /> ® ❑ 6.6 Complet Percolation Test Form (including readings)wasprovided wi REHS verification signature. The rate <br /> was correctly calculated using the last readin(Ab- ;> ore 8' <br /> ® ❑ 6.7 Discussi n of�ny potential problems predicted and/or the need for an engineered or alternative septic system. <br /> ® ❑ 6.8 Discuss B eesrcolation rates in relation to the type, size and location of future leach fields needed at the site. <br /> 7.0 CONC SION SECTION <br /> ❑ 7.1 The report was signed and stamped by the appropriately registered individul G?6 <br /> Reviewed By: //i/ .�1/ �-�.-r�p.�- Reviewed Date: <br /> EHU 25-02-003 Page 2 of 3 Sou Suitability checklist <br />