My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0006098 SSCRPT
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
G
>
GROOMS
>
31103
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-0600319
>
SU0006098 SSCRPT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:32:07 AM
Creation date
9/5/2019 10:51:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
FileName_PostFix
SSCRPT
RECORD_ID
SU0006098
PE
2622
FACILITY_NAME
PA-0600319
STREET_NUMBER
31103
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
GROOMS
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
OAKDALE
APN
20728003
ENTERED_DATE
6/27/2006 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
31103 E GROOMS RD
RECEIVED_DATE
6/27/2006 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\G\GROOMS\31103\PA-0600319\SU0006098\SSC RPT.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> N: <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> 304 East Weber Avenue, 3`d Floor, Stockton, CA 95202-2708 <br /> Telephone: (209)468-3420 Fax: (209)464-0138 Web:www.sjgov.org/ehd <br /> SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE CONTAMINATION REPORT REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> PAM <br /> SITE LOCATION: ���� 6ija,p (/q�,{ j7 A REPORT DATE: 4 <br /> S = Sufficient San Joaquin County Development Title Chapter 9-905, Section 9-905.12 <br /> 1 = Insufficient <br /> S I 1.0 INTRODUCTION & PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SECTION <br /> ❑ 1.1 Description of site(report must address all par els), including current and/or proposed zoning information. <br /> ®� ❑ 1.2 Description of proposed developmen 3� <br /> ®� ❑ 1.3 Parcel location map. 4141� <br /> �c ❑ 1.4 Site map showing location of all items on parcel. (Examples: structur drives,wells,septic systems, large trees, <br /> pastures, pools, natural drainage courses, ponds,waterways, etc.) A +-rte <br /> 2.0 PAST, PRESENT AND PROPOSED FUTURE USES OF THE SITE SECTION <br /> �� ❑ 2.1 Discussion of past, present and proposed future uses at the site to assess potential problems. (Example sources <br /> of information: current and/or previous property owners, historical maps, insurance maps, previous land use <br /> applications, etc.) <br /> C) <br /> 3.0 IDENTIFICATIO OF ALL PAST AND CURRENT SOURCES OF CONTAMINATION <br /> ,K]' ❑ 3.1 Discussions of the methods used to research and investigate the potential or known above and belowground <br /> sources of contamination at the project site. (Examples: Database search, EHD recor s search, agricultural J� <br /> chemical application search, site reconnaissance and survey, etc(j 11r5��17) e, <br /> y '4pb <br /> JE]/ ❑ 3.2 Description of all past on-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of contamination identified <br /> at the project site. (Examples: Agricultural chemical handling/storage/use, aboveground/underground tanks, <br /> septic systems, injection wellsyn sealed wells, ponds/lagoons, vehicle/machine repair/painting, buried or <br /> stockpiled solid waste, etc.) ( <br /> ] ❑ 3.3 Description of all current on-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of contamination <br /> identified at the project site (see examples ab�6e�8� <br /> ®� ❑ 3.4 Description of all past off-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of contamination identified <br /> in the area of the project site that has or may impact the project site. (Examples: Close proximity to a former <br /> landfill/former gasoline station, in area of known DBCP/Nitrate groundwater impact,et 4-",❑ 3.5 Description of all current off-site potential and/or known above and below BrDund sours�of contamination <br /> identified in the area of the project site. ! s.- B-) <br /> 4.0 EVALUATION OF PAST AND CURRENT SOURCES OF CONTAMINATION IDENTIFIED <br /> AT OR NEAR THE SITE AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER ACTION <br /> ® � ❑ 4.1 Evaluation of each potential and/or known source of contamination identified (in the above section)for any real <br /> and/or potential threat to human health anal-the environment. This evaluation should take into consideration the <br /> proposed future uses of the project partnc�7-g <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION �, <br /> F-15.1 Discussion of the above evaluation to either rule out each source as a real o ntial threat or to recommend <br /> further action to mitigate or abate any real or potential threats identified. Recommendations may include <br /> additional site assessment(i.e. collection of soil/water samples)and/or mitigative measures (i.e., clean up of <br /> surface wastes). All recommendations for future work must include a time frame for implementation. <br /> ��- ❑ 5.2 The report was inclusive(i.e. all information referenced was included in this report-report should not reference <br /> other reports). <br /> ®-� ❑ 5.3 The report was signed, dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional. <br /> 9 - ❑ 5.4 The report was prepared within six months of the date of the submittal of the land use application. <br /> � ❑ 5.5 The attachments/ nd' s contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in report. <br /> Reviewed By: Reviewed Date: 7 �� <br /> EHD 26-01 Pagel of 2 Surface&Sub Checklist <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.