Laserfiche WebLink
PaUIN <br /> SAN JOAQVIN COUNTY <br /> o......... c <br /> kw I <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT <br /> 1868 East Hazelton Avenue, Stockton, CA 95202-3029 <br /> i4-6RN� / ( � ( ) lg g <br /> r..— *3'c Telephone: 209 468-3420 Fax: 209 468-0333 Web:www.s ov.or /ehd <br /> q�I <br /> SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE CONTAMINATION REPORT REQUIREMENT CHECKLIST <br /> PA#: / +S "doZg/ s> <br /> �ESITELOCATION: 3139K x <br /> REPORT DATE: <br /> S = Sufficient <br /> I = Insufficient San Joaquin County Development Title Chapter 9-905, Section 9-905.12 <br /> S I 1.0 INTRODUCTION & PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT SECTION <br /> PT ❑ 1.1 Description of site(report must address all parcels), including current and/or proposed zoning information. <br /> ❑ 1.2 Descript on of proposed development. <br /> z <br /> �f ❑ 1.3 Parcel location map. AN <br /> ❑ 1.4 Site map showing location of all items on parcel. (Examples: structures, drives,wells, septic systems, large trees, <br /> pastures, pools, natural drainage courses,ponds,waterways, etc.) <br /> 2.0 PAST, PRESENT AND PROPOSED FUTURE USES OF THE SITE SECTION <br /> ® ❑ 2.1 Discussion of past, present and proposed future uses at the site to assess potential problems. (Example sources <br /> of information: current and/or previous property owners, historical maps, insurance maps, previous land use <br /> applications, etc.) -2� <br /> 3.0 IDENTIFICATION OF ALL PAST AND CURRENT SOURCES OF CONTAMINATION <br /> ❑ 3.1 Discussions of the methods used to research and investigate the potential or known above and belowground <br /> sources of contamination at the project site. (Examples: Database search, EHD records search,agricultural <br /> chemical application search, site reconnaissance and survey,etc.) 2":5: <br /> ❑ 3.2 Description of all past on-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of contamination identified <br /> at the project site. (Examples: Agricultural chemical handling/storage/use, aboveground/underground tanks, <br /> septic systems, injection wells, unsealed wells, ponds/lagoons,vehicle/machine repair/painting, buried or <br /> stockpiled solid waste, etc.) t, _5� <br /> ❑ 3.3 Description of all current on-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of contamination <br /> identified at the project site (see examples above). s S <br /> ® ❑ 3.4 Description of all past off-site potential and/or known above and below ground sources of contamination identified <br /> in the area of the project site that has or may impact the project site. (Examples: Close proximity to a former <br /> landfill/former gasoline station, in area f known DBCP/Nitrate groundwater impact, etc.) <br /> ❑ 3.5 Description of all current off-site poled 9d/or known above and below ground sources of contamination <br /> identified in the area of the project site. z -_ <br /> 4.0 EVALUATION OF PAST AND CURRENT SOURCES OF CONTAMINATION IDENTIFIED <br /> AT OR NEAR THE SITE AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER ACTION <br /> )� ❑ 4.1 Evaluation of each potential and/or known source of contamination identified (in the above section)for any real <br /> and/or potential threat to human health and the environment. This evaluation should take into consideration the <br /> proposed future uses of the project parcel. 5- <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SECTION <br /> ,® ❑ 5.1 Discussion of the above evaluation to either rule out each source as a real or potential threat or to recommend <br /> further action to mitigate or abate any real or potential threats identified. Recommendations may include <br /> additional site assessment(i.e.collection of soil/water samples)and/or mitigative measures(i.e.,clean up of <br /> surface wastes). All re6remmendations for future work must include a time frame for implementation. <br /> Ind ❑ 5.2 The report was inclusive(i.e. all information referenced was included in this report—report should not reference <br /> �T other reports). <br /> ❑ 5.3 The report was signed, dated and stamped by a qualified environmental professional. <br /> ❑ 5.4 The report was prepared within six months of the date of the submittal of the land use application. <br /> f ❑ 5.5 The attachments/appendices contain sufficient documentation to support claims made in report. <br /> Reviewed By: Reviewed Date: 1 1� 6 <br /> EHD 26-01 Page 1 of 2 Surface&Sub Checklist <br />