Laserfiche WebLink
The groundwater gradient under the subject site is estimated to be -19.60 ft - (-21.0 ft) _ 1,390 ft <br /> = 0.0010 ft/ft. The velocity of the groundwater under the site can be estimated by the following <br /> formula. This corresponds with the velocity determination found in the groundwater report for <br /> the Harney Landfill: <br /> -1i21 <br /> Va,,uifer= L <br /> 7.5 <br /> Where: <br /> K = Hydraulic conductivity of aquifer formation in gals/day/ft, =500 gals/day/ft- (est. based <br /> on a silty clay formation) <br /> h,= -19.6ft <br /> h, — -21.0 ft <br /> L = 1,690 ft <br /> p = porosity of aquifer = 35% (est.) <br /> V2yU,,,,— 0.16 ft/day or 58 ft/yr <br /> During the drilling procedures for the deep pert test borings, no saturated soil conditions were <br /> encountered down to the depths of 25 feet. However, it is a possibility that perched water table <br /> conditions exist above the static water table depth. <br /> A water sample was obtained from the domestic well head that serves the Diamond residence. <br /> Nitrate testing of this water sample reveals a very low nitrate concentration of 4 ppm. The <br /> Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) for nitrate (as NO,,) is 45 ppm. The agrichemicals <br /> dibromochloropro pane (DBCP) and ethylene dibromide (EDB) concentrations were found to be <br /> non-detect. The MCL for DBCP is 0.0002 ppm or 0.2 kcg/L. <br /> Nitrate concentration from a previous study directly to the north of the subject site also revealed <br /> a comparatively low nitrate concentration at 14 ppm. Explanations for this difference in nitrate <br /> concentrations may include varying well perforation elevations, total depth of each well, and <br /> grouting or sanitary seal depth. It is most likely a combination of all these factors. In addition, <br /> the vineyard to the north was deep-ripped which may have created a conduit to facilitate the <br /> downward movement of nitrate. <br /> B. SURFACE WATER INFORMATION <br /> Surface water consists of all other water sources originating on the surface of the project, other <br /> than septic system effluent. These sources include rainfall, surface runoff domestic irrigation <br /> and stormwater retention. "The San Joaquin County of Public Works - Isohyetal Map indicate 13 <br /> inches of rainfall to be the Mean Annual Precipitation in the area of the project. There should be <br /> no impact to surface waters from septic effluent provided applicable distance requirements are <br /> followed. <br /> There are aerated sewage ponds adjacent to the south of the Migrant Farm Labor Camp and <br /> directly east of the subject site. At no time during this investigation was any odor detected. <br /> 5 <br />