Laserfiche WebLink
After drilling, two inches of fine gravel was placed at the bottom and three-inch perforated PVC pipe <br /> was inserted in each test boring. The borings were pre-saturated with 12 inches of water at 1000 hrs, <br /> February 24, 24 hrs before the start of pert testing. <br /> SSS§ 6.4, 6.5. On February 25, 2008, percolation testing commenced. No standing water was <br /> observed after the 24-hr soak period in either shallow boring. Consequently, EHD Perc Test <br /> Procedure 42 was conducted. Testing was done over four hours to induce maximum soil saturation, <br /> although because of recent rains, the soil was already very moist. <br /> G ` <br /> The test results indicate a very slow (failed) percolation rate for the 36 inch test boring, and a <br /> relatively rapid Perc rate for the 42 inch test boring. A summary of the Perc test results and related <br /> data, with corresponding application rate in gallons of effluent accepted per square foot of soil, per <br /> day are found in Table 2: ` <br /> TABLE 2 <br /> PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS AND RELATED DATA <br /> SHALLOW PERC TEST POST SOAK PERC TEST RESULTS APPLICATION RATE IN <br /> DEEP PERC TEST PERIOD GALLONS/FV/DAY <br /> G �J <br /> No Standing 83.3 min/in(FAIL) 0.235 gals/sq ft/day <br /> 36 INCHES Water in Hole <br /> 42 INCHES No Standing 13.2 min/in 0.757 gals/sq ft/day <br /> Water in Hole <br /> Application Rates adapted from: Calif—Wa.State GValer Resources•Control Board Guidelinesjou the Desigx of Sewage.5`i.slenrs. <br /> � D. GROUNDWATER INFORMATION <br /> L l� NLS§ 2.1, SSS§ 4.1. Groundwater depths and elevations throughout San Joaquin County are <br /> illustrated on maps published by the County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. The <br /> most recent Lines of Equal Depth map indicates the groundwater depth to be approximately 85 feet. <br /> The 2003 Lines of Equal Elevation Map illustrates the groundwater directional flow to be generally <br /> in a southerly direction. <br /> Nearby well logs illustrates varied geological strata of clay, sand and gravel. Groundwater research <br /> in the scientific literature suggests there may be significant denitrification potential within aquifers or <br /> saturated zones composed of a fine clay soil fraction. <br /> NLS§ 2.2, 3.1, SSS§ 2.1, 4.2. Since surrounding properties have been intensely farmed for several r . <br /> decades, the potential for nitrate contamination in the underlying shallow groundwater aquifers can <br /> be considered significant for shallow wells. It is unknown how deep the on-site well is, but it is <br /> assumed to be deep. The required analyses are found in Appendix D, and summarized below in <br /> r Table 3. The nitrate and DBCP concentrations in the well water indicate a 12 ppm nitrate (as nitrate) <br /> and no DBCP. This may be attributed to sufficient intervening clay layers attenuating the downward <br /> migration of nitrate and DBCP, and sufficient denitrification potential within the underlying aquifers, <br /> as referenced above. <br /> 4 �jj <br /> Chesney Consulting <br /> I <br />