Laserfiche WebLink
The calculated nitrate loading concentration in the recharge effluent from the entire new winery l <br /> i facility is calculated to be under the Maximum Contaminant Level limit for nitrate in drinking <br /> - water. The variables used in the calculations above are very conservative. For example, the use of <br /> 103 mg N/L, is a much higher nitrogen concentration than those concentrations typically found in <br /> domestic or residential sources. <br /> (rl { ) Secondly, various researchers place the nitrogen reduction occurring in septic tanks at 10% to 20%. <br /> From the May 8, 2003 Symposium "Onsite Wastewater Treatment - Nitrogen Removal," Dr. Stuart <br /> Oakley of Chico State University states that "approximately 20% of the total nitrogen generated is <br /> removed in the septic tank." As noted above, a conservative estimate of 10% was used for the <br /> existing 1,600 gallon septic tank. Thirdly, the biomat does have the beneficial property of removing <br /> approximately 10% of the nitrogen from disposal systems. This figure was not used in the nitrate <br /> loading calculations also to maintain a conservative loading concentration. <br /> C. SEPTIC SYSTEM OPERATIONAL PARAMETERS AND COMPONENTS <br /> SSS§ 3.7. Discussion of efficient operation, disposal field longevity, and environmental protection <br /> are based upon the environmental parameters discussed below. An overview of the system <br /> operation is as follows, and is based upon the schematic found in the EHD microfiche files. The <br /> exact structures of the existing septic system cannot be accurately discerned since they were not <br /> labeled in this schematic: Influent waste from the two winery restrooms and employee restroom <br /> w'I] gravity to the existing 1,600 gallon septic tank. Effluent from this tank will then gravity flow <br /> equally between one leachline and one seepage pit, and three existing and two new seepage pits. <br /> Effluent overflow from this one pit will be directed into two new pits which were installed in <br /> November 1990. As referenced, since saturated soils were observed the entire depth of 25 feet, <br /> EHD will require the installation of two additional pits, for a total of six seepage pits. <br /> SEPTIC TANK <br /> Septic tanks store the accumulated sludge, scum and effluent (clear zone) volumes, which in turn affect <br /> treatment of nitrogen within the tanks. In the following calculation, the pump-out interval factor times the <br /> QAVE times the peaking factor(PF) correlate the pump-out time interval in years with the recommended tank <br /> capacity. The peaking factor value for this project is estimated to be 1.5. It is known that the existing, <br /> original septic tank is 1,600 gallon capacity. <br /> Recommended tank capacity for a potential pump-out interval of three years after operation: <br /> 2.8(pump-out interval factor) (QIVE) x Peaking Factor(PF= 2.5) —2.8 (450 gpd) x 1.5 = 1,890 gals. <br /> Total septic tank capacity— 1,600 gallon tank. Therefore, the tank may have to be pumped sooner than <br /> three years. <br /> Detention Time: <br /> Detention Time= 1,600 gal total tank capacity x 0.70 30% volume lost to sludge/scum accumulation <br /> 1.5 (Peaking factor) x 450 gals/day (ADF) <br /> Detention Time= 1.7 days. The minimum acceptable detention time is 1.0 day. Therefore, the existing <br /> 1,600 gallon septic tank is suitable for sufficient detention time with an adequate safety factor. <br /> 9 <br /> Chesney Consulting <br />