My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0001013
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HELEN
>
8421
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
MS-92-155
>
SU0001013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2020 6:12:14 PM
Creation date
9/5/2019 11:09:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0001013
PE
2622
FACILITY_NAME
MS-92-155
STREET_NUMBER
8421
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
HELEN
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
STOCKTON
ENTERED_DATE
10/10/2001 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
8421 N HELEN LN
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\H\HELEN\8421\MS-92-155_VR-92-02\SU0001013\EH PERM.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
,.R SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> r.•� .a.t COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ✓� j <br /> • 1810 E.HAZELTON AVE..STOCKTON.CA 952056232 <br /> • �9(�FOR�a`P DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PHONE:(209)468-3120 April 27 , 1992 <br /> PLANNING PHONE:(209)468-3120 �j _ <br /> BUILDING PHONE:(209)4683123 APR " 1997 <br /> NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION PHONE:(209)4683021 Li <br /> Board of Supervisors ENVIRONIwENIAL HEALTH <br /> Courthouse PERMIT/SERVICES <br /> Stockton, CA 95202 <br /> tf <br /> Dear Board Members: <br /> APPEAL OF THOMAS SHEPHARD, C/O STEVE HERUM, OF THE <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF VR-92-2 (DISTRICT 4) <br /> IT IS RECOMMENDED: <br /> That the Board of Supervisors deny the appeal of the Planning <br /> Commission denial of VR-92-2 . <br /> BACKGROUND: <br /> The applicants, Thomas and Irene Shephard, are proposing to vary <br /> the required 40-acre minimum parcel size to 0.95 acre and 0. 69 acre <br /> to permit a subdivision of a 1. 64 acre parcel. On April 2 , 1992 <br /> the Planning Commission heard this matter. Two people spoke in <br /> favor. The person that spoke in opposition presented a petition to <br /> oppose the Variance signed by seven of the property owners on Helen <br /> Lane. <br /> The Planning Commission voted 7 to 0 to deny the Variance based on <br /> the inability to make any of the three required findings which are <br /> listed on Page 5 of the Planning Commission Staff Report. <br /> • Finding No. 1 cannot be made because there are no special <br /> circumstances related to the topography of this property that <br /> would deny the property of privileges enjoyed by other <br /> property in the area under identical zoning. <br /> • Finding No. 2 cannot be made because granting this Variance <br /> would constitute a granting of a special privilege because two <br /> parcels with less than the 40-acre minimum could be created <br /> and an additional homesite would be allowed. Also, this <br /> finding cannot be made because granting the Variance would <br /> allow a special privilege by allowing more than the maximum <br /> number of parcels allowed on a private right-of-way. <br /> • Finding No. 3 cannot be made because granting the Variance <br /> would essentially constitute a rezoning and permit one <br /> additional residence to be constructed on the site. The AG-40 <br /> zone permits a minimum parcel size of 40 acres and one <br /> dwelling unit per 40 acres. <br /> BOS LETTER PAGE 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.