SU0001013 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

item No. 1 PC: 4-2-92 VR-92-2 Page 6 REFERRALS AND REPLIES Application referrals were sent on February 5, 1992, with responses requested by March 5, 1992- Department 992Department of Public Works (response: 3-4-92): The recommendation of Public Works is to deny the application because the private road (Helen Lane) serves more than six lots, and the proposed parcel will not have public road frontage (Resolution R-88- 1200, Planning Title Section 9-9380). It was noted that the site is not within a Flood Hazard Area. Also, the private road (Helen Lane) has an existing right-of-way of 20 feet. Public Health Services (response: 39-92): The recommendation of the Environmental Health Division is denial of the application. Reference was made to a nitrate problem identified in ER-88-1 for Morada Meadows, and the suggestion was to mitigate the problem by not creating parcels smaller than two acres. It was noted that if the Variance was approved, the subsequent Minor Subdivision application would be � subject to Ordinance requirements for (1) a soil suitability study to indicate that the area iI . ..Ile for, y _ _ 6 septic tank usage and (2) an individual sewage disposal system and well constructed under permit and inspection by Public Health Services. Building Inspection Division (response: 2-10.92): No commem was made on the Variance application. It was noted that fire apparatus access roads shall be required for new development. As of March 13, 1992 the following have not responded: Council of Governments (ALUC) City of Stockton linden Unified School District Morada Municipal Advisory Council Caltrans Waterloo-Moracia Fire District Stockton East Water District Bear Creek Resource Conservation District Pacific Gas & Electric State Department of Fish and Game APPLICATION DATA A legal ad for the public hearing was published in the Stockton Record on 3-25-92. No. of public hearing notices mailed: 46. Date: 3-23-92- The 23-92The staff report was prepared by Loree Goold.