My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0001013
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HELEN
>
8421
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
MS-92-155
>
SU0001013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/26/2020 6:12:14 PM
Creation date
9/5/2019 11:09:15 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0001013
PE
2622
FACILITY_NAME
MS-92-155
STREET_NUMBER
8421
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
HELEN
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
STOCKTON
ENTERED_DATE
10/10/2001 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
8421 N HELEN LN
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\H\HELEN\8421\MS-92-155_VR-92-02\SU0001013\EH PERM.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EDWARD R. DALE <br /> Certified Public Accountant <br /> L A Professional Accoummrry Corpora Hou <br /> February 29 , 1992 <br /> -i- <br /> San Joaquin County Planning Division �r yar <br /> 1810 East Hazelton Avenue Ldi i, 1C C1' i5lv'1 <br /> Stockton, CA 95205 <br /> attention: Loree Goold <br /> This letter is in response to our notice of a variance <br /> apnlicatio to %zsy mi;timum lot size for the property located at <br /> 3421. IT. Helen Lane, Stockton California. We own the property <br /> located next to the subject property (shown on the map as Rex <br /> Blosser) and strongly object to the proposed lot split to create <br /> two lots from the existing 1 . 64 acre lot and house. <br /> We purchased the property in July of 1991 and one of the <br /> reasons for our deciding to move out to this area was the large lot <br /> sizes and the distance between us and our neighbors . All of the <br /> current homes are located on large lots of 1 . 50 acres and larger. <br /> To split this lot into t:ao lots and houses is inconsistent with the <br /> baTahce�of`the houses on Helen Lane- and the--atmosphere- of ahe .area.<., <br /> It would create a neighbor much closer to our house than currently <br /> NNW and would not be an acceptable situation for us . If we had known <br /> of this potential lot split at the time of our purchase, we would <br /> have been reluctant to purchase the home. <br /> When you purchase a home in an area like Helen Lane, you do so <br /> with the understanding that it is a country area and the size of <br /> the lots and the space thus provided is part of what makes this <br /> area special . It also is reflected in the price that one pays for <br /> a property in this area . To split this lot in two will have a <br /> negative effect on everyone who lives in the area. The party <br /> seeking the lot split should know that this is not consistent with <br /> the area and ;•could cause problems for those left behind. The <br /> subject property has been for sale for almost a year now and this <br /> is an obvious attempt to maximize the price of the property by <br /> splitting it into two. They will not be around to see what is left <br /> behind and obviously do not care. Monetary problems of wanting <br /> more -for your property than it is north is not our problem and we <br /> are not willing to stiffer for the convenience of someone who will <br /> not even be around. <br /> ' Sincerely <br /> Edward R. Dale, C. P .A. <br /> 3031 West March Lane, Suite 212 West, Stockton, California 95219 <br /> Stockton (209) 474-2599 Modesto (209) 575-0938 roll Free (800) 540-0634 FAX (209) 474-2785 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.