Laserfiche WebLink
P <br /> Joe Cote//i C Sons <br /> 9392 N.HILDRETH LANE <br /> STOCKTON,CALIFORNIA 95212 <br /> 1%+' <br /> February 18, 1992 <br /> Loree Goold i` ,: (,'i"/•' <br /> San Joaquin Planning Division ,.�'.. <br /> 1810 East Hazelton Ave. <br /> Stockton, Ca. <br /> 95205 YIk11,40r"I1 <br /> SUBJECT: Application No (S) : VR-92-2 <br /> Dear Loree Goold, <br /> We farm 75 acres of land within a few hundred yards of the above pro- <br /> posed variance. As you may know the little area in which the variance <br /> is proposed is completely surrounded by extremely intense horticultural <br /> agriculture which requires a maximum range of farming activities. Thus <br /> the reasoning for the 40 acre minimum which is the zoning of the land in <br /> ` question. A variance allowing a less than seven tenths of an acre is <br /> certainly not congruous with farming activities directly adjacent to the <br /> proposed variance. <br /> I do not know who is proposing this variance, however, with the in- <br /> formation I have I must assume the variance has nothing to do with familial <br /> hardship. Therefore, I assume it is being done for financial gain. The <br /> variance applicant knew that the zone was greater than 6.2 acres when pur- <br /> chasing the property. Therefore, for the above reasons, we strongly oppose <br /> further subdivision of this property. <br /> However, if it is deceided to allow this variance, we would have a <br /> very good case for asking that our 75 acres be divided into 3/4 acre lots <br /> as would every other landowner in the vacinity of this subdivision. <br /> Thank you for your consideration.. <br /> *. e <br /> AJG/ds <br /> `, -13- <br />