My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0008578
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HENDERSON
>
18500
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-1000266
>
SU0008578
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:33:34 AM
Creation date
9/5/2019 11:09:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0008578
PE
2611
FACILITY_NAME
PA-1000266
STREET_NUMBER
18500
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
HENDERSON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
APN
20917004
ENTERED_DATE
1/7/2011 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
18500 S HENDERSON RD
RECEIVED_DATE
1/7/2011 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\H\HENDERSON\18500\PA-1000266\SU0008578\APPL.PDF \MIGRATIONS\H\HENDERSON\18500\PA-1000266\SU0008578\CDD OK.PDF \MIGRATIONS\H\HENDERSON\18500\PA-1000266\SU0008578\EH COND.PDF \MIGRATIONS\H\HENDERSON\18500\PA-1000266\SU0008578\EH PERM.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1064
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MOUNTAIN HOUSE NEIGHBORHOODS KAND L INITIAL STUDY 5.ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST <br /> 1.AESTHETICS <br /> chimneys, and ancillary roof structures. All other areas would be limited to two. <br /> story construction. <br /> New development would be partially screened from view by proposed <br /> landscaping along roadways. (See Figures 5.14,Views A and B,for examples of <br /> new landscaping.) Landscaping along streets and in public areas would be <br /> required as part of the MHCSD design review and approval process. No <br /> designated scenic corridors are located in the vicinity of the Mountain House <br /> community. <br /> While views toward Mt. Diablo and foothills to the west would be restricted by <br /> new buildings and new landscaping,some of these views would be available <br /> during winter months when deciduous trees have lost their leaves. Views for <br /> boaters along Old River would not be significantly affected, since the existing <br /> levee blocks views into the project site and most of the area along the river would <br /> be a regional park. <br /> With the project, a substantial amount of fill would occur near the south side of <br /> Old River to raise homes out of the floodplain. The material for this fill would be <br /> derived from the cut material that would create lakes within Neighborhoods K <br /> _ and L. The fill material would generally match that for Neighborhoods I and J to <br /> the south and west of the project site and would not create major contrasts in <br /> elevation. <br /> No new sound walls would be constructed in either neighborhood. Along Bryon <br /> Road, Neighborhood L would not include any residential uses. The land uses <br /> proposed in the area near this heavily travelled road would include a 12-acre <br /> water quality detention basin and a 2-acre transit station,with community <br /> commercial and high-density residential uses north of that. <br /> As already stated, visual impacts would not be significantly different from what <br /> was evaluated in the 1994 MEIR. No additional mitigation measures would be <br /> necessary. <br /> — b) Would the project substantially damage scenic resources? <br /> Some of the scenic resources in the project area include Old River, portions of <br /> Mountain House Creek,and the vegetative tree cover. Mountain House Creek <br /> would be retained in its current configuration and would continue to serve as part <br /> of the overall stormwater drainage system for the Mountain House community. <br /> While some scatterings of trees may be removed for new home construction, a <br /> significant number of new trees would be added with the new development. No <br /> significant trees visible from a major public roadway would be affected and no <br /> mitigation measures would be necessary. <br /> (gall 1) 5-9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.