My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0008578
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HENDERSON
>
18500
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
PA-1000266
>
SU0008578
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:33:34 AM
Creation date
9/5/2019 11:09:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0008578
PE
2611
FACILITY_NAME
PA-1000266
STREET_NUMBER
18500
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
HENDERSON
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
APN
20917004
ENTERED_DATE
1/7/2011 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
18500 S HENDERSON RD
RECEIVED_DATE
1/7/2011 12:00:00 AM
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\H\HENDERSON\18500\PA-1000266\SU0008578\APPL.PDF \MIGRATIONS\H\HENDERSON\18500\PA-1000266\SU0008578\CDD OK.PDF \MIGRATIONS\H\HENDERSON\18500\PA-1000266\SU0008578\EH COND.PDF \MIGRATIONS\H\HENDERSON\18500\PA-1000266\SU0008578\EH PERM.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1064
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5.ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST MOUNTAIN HOUSE NEIGHBORHOODS K AND L INITIAL STUDY <br /> 2.AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES <br /> include a reference to the County's Right-to-Farm Ordinance. The 500-foot <br /> buffer area along the western project boundary,which the 1994 MEIR also <br /> recommended as mitigation,was changed to a 100-to 220-foot buffer. The <br /> Board of Supervisors found that the urban/rural conflict impact could be mitigated <br /> to a less-than-significant level by these measures. <br /> For Impact No. 3 above,the 1994 MEIR(pages 6-10 through 6-11) <br /> recommended that San Joaquin County impose the agricultural mitigation fee <br /> recommended as mitigation for Impact No. 1 above, and that jurisdictions in San <br /> Joaquin County and elsewhere in the Central Valley(a) be encouraged to <br /> increase the densities of planned urban development on agricultural lands so <br /> that less agricultural acreage is used, and (b)modify their General Pians to <br /> designate agricultural lands for urban growth that will be accommodated during a <br /> planning period not to exceed 20 to 25 years. The 1994 MEIR further <br /> recommended that the legal findings adopted by each of the Local Agency <br /> Formation Commissions(LAFCOs) in the Central Valley counties when <br /> approving annexations of agricultural land or other LAFCO actions be modified to <br /> incorporate additional findings related to preservation of agricultural lands. As of <br /> June 2011,these recommended mitigation measures had not been specifically <br /> implemented. <br /> Discussion Regarding Neighborhoods K and L <br /> a) Would the project convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or <br /> Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps <br /> prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of <br /> the California Resources Agency, to a non-agricultural use? <br /> The currently proposed development within Neighborhoods K and L would not be <br /> substantially different from that evaluated in the 1994 MEIR or the Specific Plan <br /> II Initial Study. As described in the 1994 MEIR, proposed development <br /> throughout the Specific Plan II area would convert approximately 700 acres of <br /> Prime Farmland to non-agricultural use. A portion(about 145 acres)of <br /> Neighborhood K is designated as"Unique Farmland,"which includes grazing <br /> lands and other similar agricultural lands. Another portion (about 90 acres) is <br /> designated as"Urban and Built Up"lands,which appear to include storm water <br /> basins within the project site. The remainder of Neighborhoods K and L is <br /> designated as Prime Farmland. As noted earlier,the findings for the 1994 MEIR <br /> identified the loss of this farmland as a significant unavoidable impact, and the <br /> Board of Supervisors adopted"Statements of Overriding Consideration"as <br /> required by CEQA to justify the loss of 3,600 acres of Prime Farmland <br /> associated with the entire Mountain House development. <br /> The adopted Master Plan includes an implementation statement stating that if a <br /> countywide agricultural mitigation fee were established, an agricultural mitigation <br /> fee based on each agricultural acre converted to urban use must be paid by the <br /> developer to the County as specified in the ordinance. The County has adopted <br /> an agricultural fee. However,this fee excludes areas that have an urban <br /> General Plan designation or an urban zoning designation. At the time of <br /> (W711 1) 5-16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.