Laserfiche WebLink
5.ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST MOUNTAIN HOUSE NEIGHBORHOODS KAND L INITIAL STUDY <br /> 4.BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES <br /> 5) The ect would block the movement of most terrestrial s ProjPecies between <br /> the eastern base of the Altamont Hills and the Delta farmland region to the <br /> east. <br /> 6) Development of the project site would eliminate seasonal wetlands and <br /> temporarily flooded areas such as irrigated pasture and drainage swales. <br /> 7) Construction and operation of the proposed 60-acre marina would affect <br /> the productive inshore zone and riparian edge of Old River(no longer <br /> relevant since the marina has been removed from SPIT). <br /> 8) Off-site improvements, such as the raw water conveyance pipeline and <br /> pumping facilities,wastewater storage ponds, and application of <br /> wastewater irrigation,would adversely affect sensitive biological <br /> resources. <br /> Findings Related to Significant Impacts Identified in <br /> 1994 MEIR <br /> The following discussion addresses the status of mitigation measures <br /> recommended in the 1994 MEIR for biological resources impacts that apply to <br /> construction of Neighborhoods K and L. <br /> Mitigation Measure M4.11-1; The 1994 MEIR found that full mitigation that <br /> would offset project impacts of overall loss of farmland and open space was <br /> unachievable. While specific measures recommended to mitigate potential <br /> adverse impacts on San Joaquin kit fox, Swainson's hawk, other special- <br /> status species,the Mountain House Creek corridor,wetlands, and habitats <br /> associated with Old River would serve to partially mitigate the loss of <br /> existing wildlife habitat, the loss of over 4,000 acres of wildlife habitat was <br /> identified as a significant and unavoidable impact that could not be fully <br /> mitigated to a less-than-significant level. <br /> Mitigation Measure M4.11-2: Mitigation for project impacts on San Joaquin <br /> kit fox consisted of a number of mitigation scenarios for off-site <br /> compensatory habitat mitigation and implementation of take avoidance <br /> measures during construction. The mitigation measures set forth in the <br /> 1994 MEIR were contingent upon further negotiation with regulatory and <br /> resource agencies, and increased compliance with the San Joaquin County <br /> General Plan, state and federal Endangered Species Acts, and California <br /> Fish and Game Code. The findings determined that there was the little <br /> support for the 1994 MEIR determination that implementation of the Master <br /> Plan would result in loss of San Joaquin kit fox habitat. Mitigation Measure <br /> M4.11-2 was modified to consist only of standard take avoidance measures <br /> during construction. These take avoidance measures were revised to be <br /> consistent with the USFWS Standardized Recommendations for Protection <br /> of the San Joaquin Kit Fox Prior to or During Ground Disturbance(USFWS, <br /> 1997b). <br /> (917111) 5-56 <br />