Laserfiche WebLink
5.ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST MOUNTAIN HOUSE NEIGHBORHOODS KAND L IN171AL STUDY <br /> 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS <br /> reduce project impacts related to soil erosion and loss of topsoil to less-than- <br /> significant levels. <br /> c) Would the project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or <br /> that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially <br /> result in on-or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, <br /> liquefaction or collapse? <br /> See responses under Items (a)(lii) and(a)(iv)above. The geotechnical <br /> engineering studies for these neighborhoods identified a number of ways to <br /> minimize such impacts. These measures would be integrated into the design of <br /> structures for Neighborhoods K and L to mitigate impacts to less-than-significant <br /> levels. <br /> d) Would the project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1- <br /> B of the Uniform Building Code (UBC) (1994), creating substantial risks to <br /> life or property? <br /> The UBC classifies the expansive nature of soils based on an expansion index. It <br /> is generally accepted that soils with an expansion index greater than 50 are <br /> susceptible to soil expansion. Soil expansion was also addressed in Master Plan <br /> Policy 6.8.3.0.a(Soils, Geologic, and Seismic Hazards). <br /> Laboratory testing indicates that soils in Neighborhoods K and L have a medium <br /> to high expansion potential, creating the potential for substantial risks to life or <br /> property. Unless properly mitigated, soil expansion has the potential to damage <br /> foundations; cause large cracks in exterior walls,floors, and ceilings; and cause <br /> wavy`roller coaster'surfaces along driveways, sidewalks, and streets. Some <br /> techniques to mitigate these problems are moisture conditioning, lime treatment, <br /> or the replacement of expansive soils with engineered fill. Site preparation and <br /> structural design in Neighborhoods K and L would be completed in accordance <br /> with geotechnical engineering studies for these neighborhoods to mitigate the <br /> impacts. Therefore,the impacts would be less than significant. <br /> e) Would the project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use <br /> of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers <br /> are not available for the disposal of waste water? <br /> No septic tanks or alternative waste disposal systems are proposed for the <br /> project site. All wastewater would be collected in a piping system connected to <br /> the existing wastewater treatment plant located just east of Neighborhood L. The <br /> wastewater treatment plant is further discussed in Section 5.16, Utilities and <br /> Service Systems, of this Initial Study. The project would have no impact on <br /> septic systems or alternative wastewater disposal systems. Thus, no mitigation <br /> is necessary. <br /> {srrr„I 5-80 <br />