Laserfiche WebLink
5.ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST MOUNTAIN HOUSE NEIGHBORHOODS K AND L INITIAL STUDY <br /> 15. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC <br /> improvements within their respective jurisdictions,thus eliminating the need for <br /> complicated funding agreements between the affected counties. <br /> In summary,development within the Mountain House community is expected to <br /> meet its transportation mitigation responsibilities through a combination of the <br /> following: <br /> ■ Paying MHTIF fees for construction of improvements on regional gateways <br /> to the community and roadways within the community, or building roadway <br /> infrastructure within the community as required to maintain levels of service rM <br /> within the adopted standard; and <br /> ■ Paying TIMF fees for construction of improvements elsewhere in the county. <br /> Scenario 1: Existino Plus Project. To assess the potential traffic impact of the <br /> proposed project,the projected traffic volumes generated by the proposed <br /> project were added to the existing traffic. <br /> The trip generation results are shown in Table 5.15-5. Trips from outside zones <br /> into Neighborhoods K and L zones were computed as inbound trips and the <br /> converse as outbound trips. The projected existing-plus-project traffic is shown <br /> in Figure 5.15-2. The assumed intersection lane configuration and traffic control <br /> are also shown in the figure. <br /> Table 5.15.5 TRIP GENERATION FOR PROPOSED PROJECT <br /> (NEIGHBORHOODS K AND L) <br /> Inbound Outbound Total <br /> AM 881 1,216 2,097 <br /> Percent 42% 58% 100% <br /> PM 1,569 1,242 2,811 <br /> Percent 56% 44% 100% <br /> Source: TJKM,2011. <br /> Assumed Roadway Improvements. Based on consultation with Mountain House <br /> Community Services District(MHCSD)staff, it was assumed that the Central <br /> Parkway overpass would be constructed and Mountain House Parkway would be <br /> extended from Byron Road to the north to serve both of the neighborhoods. <br /> Level of Service Analysis. The level of service analysis was performed based on <br /> the assumed future roadways as described above and on existing lane <br /> configurations as shown in Figure 5.15-2. The results of the level of service <br /> analysis are shown in Table 5.15-6. The results show that, under Scenario 1,all <br /> intersections for gateway roadways would operate at LOS D or better and the <br /> remaining study intersections would operate at LOS C or better. <br /> ;sant) 5-174 <br />