Laserfiche WebLink
ra <br /> Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Report <br /> �¢ Mountain House Neighborhoods.K&L, San Joaquin County,California <br /> Fj i <br /> 3 GHG Emissions Inventory <br /> L This section describes the methodology that was used to develop the GHG emissions inventory <br /> ��.� associated with the Project. Because SJVAPCD is the primary agency responsible for <br /> comprehensive air pollution control in the San Joaquin Valley, this report follows SJVAPCD <br /> emissions calculation guidance. The Project inventory considers eight categories of GHG <br /> emissions: energy use associated with residential buildings and non-residential buildings, <br /> mobile sources, area sources, solid waste, water and-waste water, swimming pools, and <br /> vegetation. The electrical power for the Project will be supplied by Modesto Irrigation District <br /> (MID). Accordingly, indirect GHG emissions from electricity usage are calculated using the MID <br /> carbon-intensity factors adjusted for future mandated renewable energy requirements. Natural <br /> gas will be supplied by Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E). The GHG emissions inventory is <br /> summarized in Table 1. <br /> P, 3.1 Overall Calculation Methodology <br /> Consistent with the SJVAPCD guidelines discussed in the regulatory section above and with <br /> GHG emission reduction targets established in CARB's AB 32 Scoping Plan 12, ENVIRON <br /> quantified GHG emissions to show that the Project has reduced or mitigated GHG emissions by <br /> 29% compared to Baseline. This section further outlines these methodologies used to calculate <br /> the percent reduction. <br /> To calculate theP ercent reduction from the Baseline ENVIRON calculated emissions for a <br /> { Project scenario and a Baseline scenario and then calculated the percent difference between <br /> l $ the two. The year 2020 was chosen for the Project scenario to be consistent with the AB 32 <br /> l goal of achieving 1990 emission levels by 2020. These Project emissions are compared to <br /> emissions if the Project were constructed consistent with the assumptions in the CARB's <br /> E <br /> Scoping Plan ("Scoping Plan" projections for 2020 if 'no actions are taken' CARB 2020 NAT <br /> ! P� 9 { g ) p 1 ( ) <br /> !' compared to a baseline year between 2002 and 2004. <br /> E � <br /> To calculate emissions for the:Baseline scenario, ENVIRON used baseline metrics developed <br /> by SJVAPCD, when available. When baseline metrics were not available, ENVIRON developed <br /> ^ a baseline scenario based on assumptions consistent with SJVAPCD guidance. According to <br /> SJVAPCD guidance, the baseline is the average of 2002-2004: "The California Air Resources <br /> Board (CARB) used its emission inventory to establish the Baseline upon which changes in <br /> GHG emissions would be evaluated. The Baseline consists of a three-year average for GHG <br /> emissions occurring by sector during the baseline period of 2002-2004. The Baseline Period <br /> GHG emissions include emissions from all sources in CARB's emissions inventory, including <br /> both, old and new, large and small GHG emission sources"13 <br /> 0l <br /> CI <br /> 1J <br /> 'Z Climate Change Scoping Pian. CARB. December 2008. Available at: <br /> http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/document/scopingplandocument.htm <br /> as Page 28 of"SJVAPCD Final Staff Report Addressing Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impacts under the California <br /> Environmental Quality Act."Available at: http:/1www.valleyair.org/Programs/CCAP/12-17-0911%20CCAP%20- <br /> i <br /> %20 FI NAL%20C EQA%20G H G%20Staff%20Report%20-%20Dec%2017%202009:pdf <br /> I F <br /> 03-25858A 7 E N V I R 0 N <br />