Laserfiche WebLink
Phase 1 ESA Update:Neighborhoods K&L,Mountain House,CA <br /> November 9,2011 <br /> Page 2 <br /> SUMMARY OF PHASE H ESA <br /> Condor completed a partial Phase II ESA as documented in the Limited Phase II Environmental Site <br /> Assessment Report, Proposed Neighborhoods D, K, L, and Town Center, Mountain House, San Joaquin <br /> County, California, dated November 30, 2004. The purpose of the partial Phase II ESA was to evaluate <br /> the recognized environmental condition of historical agricultural chemical use. In Neighborhood K, no <br /> pesticides or herbicides were detected in the soil samples collected from the agricultural fields. hi <br /> Neighborhood L, very low concentrations of the organochlorine pesticides DDE and DDT were detected. <br /> The concentrations were well below regulatory screening levels for unrestricted land use, and thus did not <br /> pose a risk to human health or the environment. <br /> CHANGES TO ENVIRONMENTAL DATABASES <br /> The environmental records source used for this update was the same as that used for the Phase I ESA. <br /> Environmental Data Resources (EDR) provided an EDR® Radius Map for the Site (Attachment B). The <br /> EDR Radius Map was reviewed including the orphan summaries.None of the locations listed in the EDR <br /> report appear to pose a risk to the Site, and several locations are past school site environmental <br /> investigations conducted by Condor under the oversight of the Department of Toxic Substances Control <br /> (DTSC). The California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) and DTSC online databases <br /> were reviewed. Several investigations along Byron Road have been or are currently being conducted <br /> under RWQCB oversight related to the petroleum pipelines located there. Although the RWQCB has <br /> granted closure to several of these locations, the DTSC has not granted closure and is reviewing work <br /> conducted under RWQCB oversight. <br /> CHANGES TO SITE <br /> A driving reconnaissance of the surrounding area and a walking reconnaissance of the Site were <br /> perforined by Alex Dewitt in accordance with the ASTM practice on November 9, 2011 (Photographs, <br /> Attachment C). The Site was mass-graded and some underground utilities were installed in 2007 and <br /> 2008. Several monitoring wells were installed and monitored by Condor in both neighborhoods in the late <br /> 2000s for the purposes of monitoring groundwater quality during past land discharge of treated <br /> wastewater. The results of monitoring indicated no significant impact of groundwater related to the <br /> wastewater discharge. During the Site reconnaissance, several debris piles consisting mostly of native <br /> soil, concrete, and irrigation piping were observed on Neighborhood L. Large soil mounds resulting from <br /> grading operations were observed on both neighborhoods, and soil type was consistent with native soil. <br /> The wastewater detention ponds have not been in use for several years, and are planned to be removed in <br /> the future. <br /> OPINION AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> It is Condor's opinion that the only remaining recognized environmental condition for Neighborhoods K <br /> and L is the potential for petroleum hydrocarbons in soil and/or groundwater associated with the <br /> petroleum pipelines adjacent to the southern portion of Neighborhood L. There are no additional <br /> recognized environmental conditions relating to the Site. The monitoring wells are considered de minimis <br /> conditions. These wells should be properly abandoned/destroyed before development is completed. <br /> i <br /> CONDOR <br />