Laserfiche WebLink
_ There is a septic system on site. There is a domestic well and tank within a <br /> wooden structure. According to the owner, there are no buried tanks on the <br /> property. There are no visual signs of any such tanks (ground settling, irregular <br /> ground, etc.). <br /> There is a ponding area that retains storm runoff from the 54 acre parcel. <br /> Rainwater is disposed of by natural drainage, percolation, or evaporation. <br /> As previously stated, the site has been used for grazing purposes. The owner raises <br /> cattle on the property. <br /> Since it is grazing land, no chemicals are applied to the land. See Appendix for <br /> additional detail regarding chemical use. <br /> The depth to groundwater in this vicinity is approximately 100 feet. The soil type <br /> is generally loam. <br /> According to Mr. Sarver, there are no known chemical containers buried on the <br /> property. A visual inspection did not produce any evidence of buried containers. <br /> The field investigation also did not yield any unusual (noxious) orders. <br /> CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION <br /> Based on visual observation, County records noted, and testimony of the property <br /> owner, there appears to be no surface contamination. Given the scope of this <br /> study, the probability of subsurface contamination should be considered low and <br /> normal to this region. Based on visual observation, no corrective action is <br /> necessary at this time. <br /> LIMITATIONS <br /> Dillon & Murphy does not assume responsibility for the discovery and elimination of <br /> environmental hazards which may be discovered. Recommendations suggested in <br /> noway a *inn of any possible environmental concerns. <br /> The exte ice or subsurface conditions do not <br /> '- exist. T ; exist. <br /> _ oe Murphy, R.C.E. 45277 <br /> 2 <br /> C:\Dillon&Murphy\033Murface&Subsurface Report <br />