My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
88 (STATE ROUTE 88)
>
13336
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544810
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/20/2024 9:23:29 AM
Creation date
9/5/2019 11:50:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0544810
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005586
FACILITY_NAME
RON NUNAN CHEVRON
STREET_NUMBER
13336
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 88
City
LOCKEFORD
Zip
95237
APN
01902044
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
13336 E HWY 88
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
198
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DEC-31-01 13:23 FROM:PATTS COPY WORLD ID= 70793S72SS PAGE 2/7 <br /> i2-3062MI C-06"k,k0d—Weil Abanderr� for hI�. 644MT! 2 of 2 <br /> Field Procedures <br /> The abandonment of groundwater monitoring wells MW-1, MW-2, and MW-3 was <br /> performed by a C-57 licensed driller under the supervision of a State Certified 2001 <br /> Hydrogeologist(See Figure 1 for Well Locations). According to the November 03, <br /> Workplan for Groundwater Monitoring Well Abandonment report,the three(3)wells were <br /> to be pressure grouted from the bottom up to the seat, and then, drilled out from the top <br /> to the bottom of the seal prior to final grouting.the San Joaquin County Health well <br /> abandonment workplan approval letter dated November 07, 2001, required an altemadve <br /> method which was to drill out each well to the total depth of the well construction and <br /> then grout from the bottom up through the hollow stem auger. The well abandonment <br /> was perform according to San Joaquin County requirements. <br /> The depth to groundwater was sounded to verify that the water levels were consistent <br /> with past readings and that the total depth of each well's casing was measured, in order <br /> to verify that no debris or obstructions were present in the well casing. <br /> Each of the three wells were over drilled with an a 114 inch diameter hollow-stern auger, <br /> through the existing 7 314 inch diameter borehole through the bentonite seal(i.e. <br /> between 72 and 75 feet bgs)to 100 feet bgs, during which time,the old well casing and <br /> associated well construction materials were removed. The center rod was slipped inside <br /> the two(2) inch diameter casing,within the hollow stem of the auger, in order to allow <br /> the rod to extract the casing from the borehole during the drilling process. <br /> After each well was cleaned out to 100 feet bgs,they were grouted utilizing the hollow <br /> stem as a tremie pipe, as per Jeff Wong of San Joaquin County Health,with a Portiand <br /> Type 1/11 cement mixed with approximately 56/6 bentonite grout to within 3.0 feet of <br /> ground surface in MW-2,within 7.0 feet in MW-3, and to within 5 feet within MW-1. <br /> Approximately 20% more grout was used In MW-2, 10% more in MW-3, and 5%more in <br /> MW-I,than was anticipated due to grout consumption by the perched gravel aquifer. <br /> Each of the three grouted boreholes were later topped off with grout to within 1 '/x feet of <br /> the surface and capped with black concrete(See Figure 2 for Cross Section). <br /> Approximately 18 drums of drill cuttings and decontamination wager generated during <br /> abandonment activities were stored on site in sealed Department-of-Transportation <br /> (DOT)-approved, 55-gallon metal drums to be transported to a legal point of disposal. <br /> LIMITATIONS <br /> This report has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted environmental, <br /> geological and engineering practices. No warranty,either expressed or implied, is made <br /> as to the professional advice presented herein. The analyses, conclusions and <br /> recommendations contained in this report are based upon site conditions as they <br /> existed at the time of the investigation and they are subject to change. The conclusions <br /> presented in this report are professional opinions based solely upon visual observations <br /> made within Individual soil excavations and of the site and vicinity as well as on <br /> interpretations of available information as designated in this report.GeoSoly, LLC, <br /> maintains that the limited scope of services performed in the execution of this <br /> investigation may not be sufficient to satisfy the needs,and/or requirements of all <br /> regulatory agencies or other users. Any use or reuse of this document, its findings, its <br /> conclusions and/or recommendations presented herein, is done so at the sole risk of the <br /> said user. <br /> 12-306200= aeoSotv,,UC—WeeReD Abando Report for 111vnan POW 2 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.