Laserfiche WebLink
4, <br /> TABLE 1 - CHECKLIST OF REQUIRED DATA � <br /> FOR NO <br /> FURTHER ACTION REQUESTS AT UNDERGROUND D TA <br /> NK SITES <br /> � <br /> 13336 E. H 88, Lockeford, San Joaquin County <br /> Site Name and Location: Former Town 8�Country Chevron, Hwy. q h► <br /> L <br /> Mokelumne River 1 mi North and West <br /> Na 1:Distance to production wells for municipal, domestic, agriculture, industry and Bear Creek 3/4 mi southeast i <br /> other uses within 2000 feet of the site; <br /> 2. Site maps to scale of area impacted showinglocations of farmer and existing tank systems need subsurface u00-7,s <br /> excavation contours and sami2le location , boring and monitoring well elevation contours, 10,000 gal reg., 5,000-7,000- <br /> gradients, and nearby surface wafers, buildings, streets: and subsurface utilities; gallon unleaded, 550-gallon <br /> waste oil removed 1991 <br /> EYD 3. Figures depicting lithology(cross section), treatment system diagrams; on-site geologic logs contain limited into. <br /> Regional geologic logs complete <br /> t <br />'k a 4. Stockpiled soil remaining on-site or off-site disposal(quantity); Unknown'amount disposed off-site <br /> 6 barrels of soil(drill cuttings)disposed at Forward <br /> 6 borings_destroyed <br /> --5.'Monitoring wells remaining.on=site;•fate;..` <br /> Borings 0 to 30 ft bgs ground water not encountered 6. Tabulated results of a!!groundwater elevations and depths to water, SJ Closure Summary 70-100 ft bgs <br /> E, <br /> 7.Tabulated results of all sampling and analyses: <br /> MTBE Defection limits 0.105 to 36 mg/kg needs to be 0.05 mg/kg <br /> Other oxygenated detection limits 0.4 to 8 mg/kg <br /> Y�Defection limits for confirmation sampling <br /> FLead analyses <br /> NA 8. Co ion contours of contaminants found and those remaining(ri s i TPH-g and BTEX extend laterally beyond <br /> and groundwater, and both on-site and off-site: 8-3,4,and 5, beneath Maintenance Shop <br /> N Lateral and N Vertical extent of soil contamination and extend vertically beyond 26 ft bgs in <br /> B-1 and 21 ft in B-5 Vertical extent of <br /> L'J Latera!andN Vertical extent of groundwater contamination initial release not defined <br /> NA 9.Zone of influence calculated and assumptions used for subsurface <br /> remediation system and the zone of capture attained for the soil and <br /> groundwater remediation system; <br /> 0 10.Reports/information Fl Unauthorized Release Form 2/17/88 8 8/27/91 ❑N QMRs(Dates) <br /> Welland boring logs Other(report name) Subsurface Environmental Investigation 918197& 11/9/97 <br /> ABest Available Technology(BA 7) used&-6" i explanation for hot using BAT, `�contarriinatecJ "soil remainsladdiiionai'��"—=' <br /> remediation may be required <br /> 1FN <br /> 12.Reasons why background was Contamination beneath bldg, and portion not beneaths unattainable using BAT; bldg. extends to greater than 26 ft bgs. <br /> 0 13.Mass balance calculation of substance treated versus that remaining; Vertical extent of contamination unknown <br /> 14.Assumptions, parameters, calculations and model used in risk RBCA needs to be conducted to determine the effect of <br /> assessments, and fate and transport modeling; benzene on indoor air quality <br /> 015' .Rationale why conditions remaining at site will not adversely Vertical extend of contamination is greater than 26 ft <br /> impact water quality, health, or other beneficial uses,and bgs. Wafer table 70-100 ft bgs. Contamination could <br /> extend to'�water table. <br /> KI <br /> 16.WET or TCLP results Need to determine the concentration of contaminated water <br /> migrating through the vadose zone to potentially impact gw <br /> By. Comments: Board staff do not concur with San Joaquin County. Further investigation is needed at this site <br /> to determine the vertical extent of soil contamination due to the initial release of petroleum contaminants. <br /> Da The initial contamination may have impacted ground water. <br /> I4 <br />