Laserfiche WebLink
• January 27, 1999 <br /> SECOR <br /> E <br /> F <br /> I� F <br /> lrrfct uctlrurtul itrcur�x,tulcc! 3 <br /> Ms Anastasia Duarte-Wilkinson <br /> Time Oil Company <br /> 2737 West Commodore Way <br /> Seattle, WA 98199 <br /> SUBJECT: Quarterly Monitoring Report, October- December 1998 <br /> Jackpot Food Mart <br /> 14000 East Highway 88 <br /> Lockeford, California ' <br /> k <br /> Ms Duarte-Wtlkmson <br /> t <br /> This report presents the results of quarterly groundwater monitonng and sampling conducted at the Jackpot <br /> Food Mart at 14000 East Highway, Lockeford, California (the site, see Figure 1) <br /> GROUNDWA'T'ER MONI'T'ORING AND SAMPLING , <br /> Ten groundwater monitor wells were sampled on October 26 1998 at the site Monitor wells MW-1 <br /> through MW-4 were installed as part of an environmental investigation conducted in December 1994 In ` <br /> July 1996, monitor wells MW-5 through MW-10 were installed as part of an additional environmental site <br /> assessment Prior to purging each groundwater monitor well, a water sample was taken and subjective r ;r <br /> ianalyses performed The subjective analyses consisted of checking for floating product or a hydrocarbon <br /> sheen by lowering a clean teflon bailer down the well and collecting a sample at the groundwater-atr ' <br /> interface Wells not containing floating product were purged of approximately 2 to 4 casing volumes of <br /> water or until groundwater parameters of pH, temperature, and conductivity stabilized as measured by <br /> portable meters calibrated to a standard buffer and conductivity standard If the well was slow to recover � A <br /> or purged dry, the water level in the monitor well was allowed to recover to at least 80 percent of its static s; <br /> level before sampling The groundwater samples were then collected by lowering a clean disposable bailer <br /> into the well and collecting a representative sample The groundwater samples were slowly transferred to j <br /> laboratory-cleaned sample containers, sealed with teflon caps, labelled with the sample number, sample time <br /> and date, and immediately placed on ice in an insulated container Each sample was logged onto a chain-of- f ` <br /> custody record for subsequent delivery to Excelchem Environmental Labs located in Roseville, California '`" <br /> Groundwater samples were analyzed for TPHg, BTEX, and MTBE using modified EPA Method 8015, and <br /> EPA Method 602 respectively Sample DUP was submitted as afield duplicate for monitor well MW-1 <br /> hF � <br /> Groundwater Elevation Data <br /> Depth to groundwater was obtained from the existing groundwater monitor wells at the site using a water <br /> level indicator graduated to 0 01 foot The depth to groundwater measurement was converted to a <br /> groundwater elevation for each well and used to construct a potentiometric surface map (Figure 2), and <br /> calculate the local groundwater flow direction and hydraulic gradient Groundwater at the site was i <br /> ✓ E' h <br /> measured at depths between 64 14 to 76 39 feet bgs The groundwater potentiometric surface elevation <br /> averaged approximately 69 99 feet below ground surface (bgs) during this monitoring event The <br /> • groundwater potentiometric surface elevation has decreased approximately 0 18 feet since the last sampling <br /> event in August 1998 The groundwater flow direction during this reporting period is toward the south <br /> with a hydraulic gradient of approximately 0 03 ft /ft A summary of data regarding groundwater levels MIME" <br /> Y�r y <br /> D MT OJAI OCKFORDgm 496 SECOR a 1 <br /> 7CO0"01 01/40004 Janenry 27 1999 wi <br /> 9912 Bnvnen Park l)m e Sinte iof) 5a(rainenro C',4 95827 (9161 364-1880(916) 364-1889/A1 a wn recorconr �`�a r <br />