My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0007112
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
88 (STATE ROUTE 88)
>
14000
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0544811
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0007112
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/20/2024 9:21:18 AM
Creation date
9/5/2019 1:34:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0007112
RECORD_ID
PR0544811
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0000091
FACILITY_NAME
Colonial Energy CE 40138 (DBA Power Mart)
STREET_NUMBER
14000
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 88
City
LOCKEFORD
Zip
95237
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
14000 E HWY 88
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
October 16, 1998 SECOR <br /> Ms Anastasia Duarte-Wilkinson h//c/natrowd Inc wj)o)eller/ <br /> Time Oil Company <br /> 2737 West Commodore Way <br /> Seattle, WA 98199 <br /> SUBJECT: Quarterly Monitoring Report, July- September 1998 <br /> Jackpot Food Mart <br /> 14000 East Highway 88 <br /> Lockeford, California <br /> rt <br /> Ms Duarte-Wilkinson i <br /> This report presents the results of quarterly groundwater monitoring and sampling conducted at the Jackpot <br /> Food Mart at 14000 East Highway, Lockeford, California (the site, see Figure 1) hR, <br /> - <br /> GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND SAMPLING <br /> Ten groundwater monitor wells were sampled on August 13, 1998 at the site Monitor wells MW-1 ; <br /> through MW4 were installed as part of an environmental investigation conducted in December 1994 In <br /> July 1996, monitor wells MW-5 through MW-10 were installed as part of an additional environmental site F � " <br /> assessment Prior to purging each groundwater monitor well, a water sample was taken and subjective <br />� analyses performed The subjective analyses consisted of checking for floating product or a hydrocarbon <br /> sheen by lowering a clean teflon bailer down the well and collecting a sample at the groundwater-air <br /> interface Wells not containing floating product were purged of approximately 2 to 4 casing volumes of <br /> water or until groundwater parameters of pH, temperature, and conductivity stabilized as measured by ' <br /> portable meters calibrated to a standard buffer and conductivity standard If the well was slow to recover <br /> - <br /> or purged dry, the water level in the monitor well was allowed to recover to at least 80 percent of its static <br /> level before sampling The groundwater samples were then collected by lowering a clean disposable bailer <br /> into the well and collecting a representative sample The groundwater samples were slowly transferred to <br /> laboratory-cleaned sample containers, sealed with teflon caps, labelled with the sample number, sample time { <br /> and date, and immediately placed on ice in an insulated container Each sample was logged onto a chain-of- <br /> custody record for subsequent delivery to Excelchem Environmental Labs located in Roseville, California <br /> Groundwater samples were analyzed for TPHg, BTEX, and MTBE using modified EPA Method 8015, and <br /> EPA Method 602 respectively Sample DUP was submitted as a field duplicate for monitor well MW-2 <br /> i <br /> Groundwater Elevation Data R t <br /> Depth to groundwater was obtained from the existing groundwater monitor wells at the site using a waterTt <br /> level indicator graduated to 0 01 foot The depth to groundwater measurement was converted to al ' 't <br /> groundwater elevation for each well and used to construct a potentiometnc surface map (Figure 2), and s rt} <br /> calculate the local groundwater flow direction and hydraulic gradient Groundwater at the site was i • {� , <br /> measured at depths between 64 32 to 76 85 feet bgs The groundwater potentiometnc surface elevation <br /> averaged approximately 69 81 feet below ground surface (bgs) dunng this monitoring event The " <br /> groundwater potentiometnc surface elevation has increased approximately 2 81 feet since the last sampling m <br /> event in April 1998 The groundwater flow direction during this reporting period is toward the south with <br /> a hydraulic gradient of approximately 0 04 ft/ft A summary of data regarding groundwater levels <br /> s <br /> D Mme ow ocFoxnq.jsa SEcoR <br /> 7Coosoo4aln.p(, octobe 16 3"S <br /> 9912I311ctne%, Palk Dni c Suite 100 Srrr�amc)tto (A 95827 1910 i(),i i,,No(916) 161- 1 11 it ii,r c(w cunt <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.