Laserfiche WebLink
July 28, 1999 <br /> SECOR <br /> . Ms Anastasia Duarte-Wilkinson Irlc'>>trdlrr,�rrrll�t{ �,fj�r,�c�tcrl <br /> Time Oil Company <br /> 2737 West Commodore Way <br /> Seattle, WA 98199 <br /> SUBJECT: Quarterly Monitoring Report, April _ June 1999 <br /> Jackpot Food Mart <br /> 14000 East Highway 88 <br /> Lockeford, California <br /> Ms Duarte-Wilkinson <br /> This report presents the results of quarterly groundwater monitoring and sampling conducted at the Jackpot <br /> Food Mart at 14000 East Highway, Lockeford, California (the site, see Figure 1) <br /> GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND SAMPLING <br /> Ten groundwater monitor wells were sampled on April 26, 1999 at the site Monitor wells MW-1 through <br /> MW-4 were installed as part of an environmental investigation conducted in December 1994 In July 1996, <br /> monitor wells MW-5 through MW-10 were installed as part of an additional environmental site <br /> assessment Prior to purging each groundwater monitor well, a water sample was taken and subjective <br /> analyses performed 1 he subjective analyses consisted of checking for floating product or a hydrocarbon <br /> sheen by lowering a clean teflon bailer down the well and collecting a sample at the groundwater-air <br /> interface Wells not containing floating product were purged of approximately 2 to 4 casing volumes of <br /> water or until groundwater parameters of pIJ, temperature, and conductivity stabilized as measured by <br /> portable meters calibrated to a standard buffer and conductivity standard If the well was slow to recover <br /> or purged dry, the water level in the monitor well was allowed to recover to at least 80 percent of its static <br /> level before sampling The groundwater samples were then collected by lowering a clean disposable bailer <br /> into the well and collecting a representative sample The groundwater samples were slowly transferred <br /> to laboratory-cleaned sample containers, sealed with tefloncaps, labeled with the sample number, sample <br /> time and date, and immediately placed on ice in an insulated container Each sample was logged onto a <br /> chain-of-custody record for subsequent delivery to Excelchem Environmental Labs located in Roseville, <br /> California Groundwater samples were analyzed for TPHg, BTEX and MTBE using modified EPA <br /> Method 8015, and EPA Method 602 respectively Sample DUP was Submitted as afield duplicate for <br /> monitor well MW-1 <br /> Groundwater Elevation Data <br /> Depth to groundwater was obtained from the existing groundwater monitor wells at the site using a water <br /> level indicator graduated to 0 01 foot The depth to groundwater measurement was converted to a <br /> groundwater elevation for each well and used to construct a groundwater elevation contour map (Figure <br /> 2), and calculate the local groundwater flow direction and hydraulic gradient Groundwater at the site was <br /> measured at depths between 64 96 to 77 00 feet below ground surface (bgs) The groundwater <br /> potentiometric surface elevation averaged approximately 70 69 feet bgs during this monitoring event The. <br /> groundwater elevation has decreased approximately 0 23 feet since the last sampling event in January <br /> 1999 The groundwater flow direction during this reporting period is toward the south with a hydraulic <br /> O Mme 0011.ckdf rdQ2 99 'ILCOR <br /> 0774t717003 July 2b 1999 <br /> , J1 ' l fr, ,1. " I , / I � of( 100 41, ,ru, <br />