Laserfiche WebLink
SECOR www secor corn <br /> INTERNATIONAL 3017 Mgorc Road Suite 100 <br /> S E C O R INCORPORATED Rancho Cordova CA 95670 <br /> 916 861-0400 TEL <br /> 916 861-0430 rAx <br /> January 30, 2003 <br /> Ms Anastasia Duarte-Wilkinson <br /> Time Oil Company <br /> 2737 West Commodore Way <br /> Seattle, WA 98199 <br /> RE Quarterly Monitoring Report, October--December 2002 <br /> Jackpot Food Mart <br /> 14000 East Highway 88 <br /> Lockeford, California <br /> SECOR Project No 770T 41737 00 <br /> Ms Duarte-Wilkinson <br /> This report presents the results of quarterly groundwater monitoring and sampling conducted at the Jackpot <br /> Food Mart at 14000 East Highway 88,Lockeford, California(the site,see Figure 1) In addition,the operation <br /> of the soil vapor extraction and air sparging remediation system is described <br /> GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND SAMPLING <br /> Nine groundwater monitor wells were sampled on November 12, 2002 at the site Monitor wells MW-1 <br /> through MW-4 were installed as part of an environmental investigation conducted in December 1994 In July <br /> 1996, monitor wells MW-5 through MW-10 were installed as part of an additional environmental site <br /> assessment Prior to purging each groundwater monitor well, a water sample was taken and subjective <br /> analyses performed The subjective analyses consisted of checking for liquid-phase hydrocarbons(LPH)ora <br /> hydrocarbon sheen by lowering a clean Teflon® bailer dawn the well and collecting a sample at the <br /> groundwater-air interface Wells not containing LPH were purged of approximately 2 to 4 casing volumes of <br /> water or until groundwater parameters of pH, temperature, and conductivity stabilized as measured by <br /> portable meters calibrated to a standard buffer and conductivity standard If the well was slow to recover or <br /> purged dry,the water level in the monitor well was allowed to recover to at least 80 percent of its static level <br /> before sampling The groundwater samples were then collected by lowering a clean disposable bailer into the <br /> well and collecting a representative sample The groundwater samples were slowly transferred to laboratory- <br /> cleaned sample containers,sealed with Teflon®-lined caps,labeled with the sample number,sample time and <br /> date, and immediately placed on ice in an insulated container Each sample was logged onto a chain-of- <br /> custody record for subsequent delivery to Excelchem Environmental Labs located in Roseville, California <br /> Groundwater samples were analyzed for TPHg and BTEX using modified EPA Method 602/8015,and by EPA <br /> Method 8260 for fuel oxygenates methyl tertiary butyl ether(MTBE),di-isopropyl ether(DIPE), ethyl tertiary <br /> butyl ether (ETBE), tertiary amyl methyl ether(TAME), and tertiary butanol (TBA) <br /> GROUNDWATER ELEVATION DATA <br /> Depth to groundwater was obtained from the existing groundwater monitor wells at the site using a water level <br /> indicator graduated to 0 01 foot The depth to groundwater measurement was converted to a groundwater <br /> elevation for each well and used to construct a groundwater elevation contour map (Figure 2), and calculate <br /> the local groundwater flow direction and hydraulic gradient Groundwater at the site was measured at depths <br /> between 71 68 to 85 55 feet below ground surface(bgs) The groundwater potentiometric surface elevation <br /> averaged approximately 24 82 feet bgs during this monitoring event <br /> \Time Od\LockefordQ402 doc <br />