Laserfiche WebLink
d <br /> PHONE 285 7400 <br /> CABLE ADDRESS T6,011- <br /> SEATTLE <br /> IwIOILSEATTLE TE (FAX) 206 283 8036 <br /> TACOM <br /> PORTLA D <br /> STOCKTON T <br /> &ENOOS EDLES u '� o 0 TIME ® L o <br /> ?; l — <br /> r S TS 2737 WEST COMMODORE WAY SEATTLE WA 98199 1233 <br /> PRODUCTS , PO BOX 24447 SEATTLE WA 98124 0447 <br /> TIME TESTED E <br /> July 22, 2002 <br /> Mr Harlin Knoll cn <br /> San Joaquin County Public Health Services �� o w U <br /> Environmental Health Division rscc <br /> P O Box 2009 u,c/ <br /> Stockton, California 95201 T?' <br /> ui o <br /> RE Submittal of"Quarterly MonitoringApri � <br /> Jackpot Food Mart, 14000 E Highwrt,8, Lock d rd, Califoaa�Property No 04-049) <br /> Dear Mr Knoll, <br /> An environmental investigation was implemented at the subject site in December 1994 to evaluate the extent <br /> of hydrocarbon-impacted soils and to determine whether or not groundwater had been impacted A total of <br /> four monitoring wells were installed during this investigation In July 1996, six additional monitoring wells were <br /> installed on and off of the subject site to assist in defining the extent of groundwater impacts and quarterly <br /> monitoring was implemented In August and September 1999, SECOR installed a vapor extraction/air <br /> sparging system at the subject site to remediate hydrocarbon-impacted soils and groundwater System <br /> operation began December 13, 1999 <br /> Please find enclosed'SECOR s 'Quarterly Monitoring Report, April - June 2002 dated July 19, 2002 This <br /> document presents analytical results and field observations collected during Second Quarter 2002 <br /> groundwater sampling, and discusses the efficiency of the remediation system currently in operation <br /> Second Quarter 2002 Groundwater Sampling Results <br /> On May 16, 2002, groundwater samples were collected from MW-1 through MW-4 and MW-6 through MW- <br /> 10 at the subject site by a representative of SECOR MW-5 was not sampled as it did not recharge following <br /> purging Prior to purging, the depth to water in all wells was measured to evaluate elevation, flow direction, <br /> and gradient As noted in the attached report, groundwater with a southwesterly flow direction and a gradient <br /> of 0 03 ft/ft was encountered in the wells at depths of 70 74 feet to 78 66 feet below ground surface Free <br /> product was not encountered in any of the wells The locations of the wells are identified on Figure 2 of the <br /> attached report <br /> Since the March 2002 sampling event, groundwater elevation increased in each of the wells by 1 78 feet to <br /> 8 22 feet, resulting in an overall average increase in groundwater elevation of 2 75 feet across the site <br /> Changes in groundwater elevation are most likely a result of seasonal variation, operation of the remediation <br /> system, and recent re-surveying of the wells Groundwater gradient and flow direction remained consistent <br /> with previously collected data Table 1 in the attached report summarizes historical groundwater elevation <br /> data <br /> Elevated concentrations of hydrocarbons were identified in the sample collected from MW-1 (1,700 ppb TPH- <br /> g, 5 2 ppb toluene, 28 ppb ethylbenzene, and 250 ppb xylenes) Residual concentrations of hydrocarbons <br /> were identified in the samples collected from MW-2 (0 5 ppb toluene), MW-3 (0 6 ppb toluene), and MW-8 <br /> (0 8 ppb toluene and 1 0 ppb xylenes) TPH-g and BTEX were not identified in the groundwater samples <br /> submitted from MW-4, MW-6, MW-7, MW-9 and MW-10 Analyses identified low concentrations of MTBE in <br /> the samples collected from MW-2 (0 7 ppb), MW-4 (1 6 ppb), MW-7 (0 6 ppb), and MW-9 (0 6 ppb), however <br /> none of the other samples contained detectable concentrations of MTBE Table 2, Table 3, and Figure 3 in <br /> the attached report summarize groundwater analytical data and laboratory reports are included as <br /> Attachment 2 <br />