Laserfiche WebLink
J <br /> SECOR <br /> INTERNArIONAI 3017 Kilgore Road Suite 100 <br /> S E C ® R !NCVI,PORA7ED Rancho Cordova CA 95670 <br /> 916-861-0400 reg <br /> • 916-861 0430 FwK <br /> September 16, 2004 <br /> Mr Mark Chandler <br /> Time Oil Company <br /> 2737 West Commodore Way <br /> Seattle, WA 98199 <br /> RE Quarterly Monitoring Report, July—September 2004 <br /> Jackpot Food Mart <br /> 14000 East Highway 88 <br /> Lockeford, California <br /> SECOR Project No 770T 41737 00 <br /> Mr Chandler <br /> This report presents the results of quarterly groundwater monitoring and sampling conducted at the Jackpot <br /> Food Mart at 14000 East Highway 88, Lockeford, California (the site, see Figure 1) In addition, this report <br /> also includes a quarterly summary of the operation of the sod vapor extraction (SVE)/air sparge (AS) <br /> remediation system at the site <br /> GROUNDWATER MONITORING AND SAMPLING <br /> Nine groundwater monitor wells (MW-1 through MW-4, MW-6 through MW-10)at the site were sampled on <br /> July 23,2004 Monitor well MW-5 was not sampled as it was reportedly dry this quarter Monitor wells MW-1 <br /> through MW-4 were installed as part of an environmental investigation conducted in December 1994 In July <br /> 1996, monitor wells MW-5 through MW-10 were installed as part of an additional environmental site <br /> assessment Procedures for groundwater monitoring and sampling are described below <br /> Prior to purging each groundwater monitor well, a water sample was taken, and subjective analyses was <br /> performed The subjective analyses consisted of checking for the presence of LPH or a hydrocarbon sheen by <br /> lowering a clean Teflone bailer down the well and collecting a sample at the groundwater-air interface Wells <br /> not containing LPH were purged of approximately 2 to 4 casing volumes of water or until groundwater <br /> parameters of pH, temperature, and conductivity stabilized as measured by portable meters calibrated to a <br /> standard buffer and conductivity standard If the well was slow to recover or purged dry,the water level in the <br /> monitor well was allowed to recover to at least 80 percent of its static level before sampling Groundwater <br /> samples were then collected by lowering a clean disposable bailer into thewell,and collecting a representative <br /> sample The groundwater samples were slowly transferred to laboratory-cleaned sample containers, sealed <br /> with Teflon"-lined caps, labeled with the sample number, sample time and date, and immediately placed on <br /> ice in an insulated container Each sample was logged onto a chain-of-custody record for delivery to <br /> Excelchem Environmental Labs located in Roseville,California Groundwater samples were analyzed for total <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline(TPHg)and benzene,toluene,ethylbenzene, and xylenes(BTEX)using <br /> modified EPA Method 8015 Modified/8021, and for fuel oxygenates including methyl tertiary butyl ether <br /> (MTBE), di-isopropyl ether(DIPE), ethyl tertiary butyl ether(ETBE), tertiary amyl methyl ether(TAME), and <br /> tertiary butanol (TBA) using EPA Method 82608 <br /> GROUNDWATER ELEVATION DATA <br /> Depth to groundwater was obtained from the existing groundwater monitor wells at the site using a water level <br /> indicator graduated to 0 01 foot The depth to groundwater measurement was used to calculate a <br /> groundwater elevation for each well, and construct a groundwater elevation contour map(Figure 2) Using the <br /> groundwater elevation contour map, the local groundwater flow direction and hydraulic gradient were <br /> evaluated Groundwater at the site was measured at depths between 71 74 to 88 61 feet below ground <br /> I Mme Oi11Lockeford\QMRs120041Lockeford Q3-04 doc <br />