Laserfiche WebLink
F <br /> si-Annual Ground-Water Monitoring Report <br /> 13975 Highway 88-E <br /> Lockaford, caiifornis <br /> NGA Project No. 10-90-104 <br /> Page 3 <br /> arouneater„Fa1�ti�oal Results <br /> Ground water samples collected on April 16, 1991, were analyzed for. <br /> BTEX constituents and TPH by a California-certified laboratory. <br /> The laboratory results (attached) indicate that BTEX constituents <br /> and TPH were not detected at monitoring wells MW-1, MW-3, and MW- <br /> 4. Benzene and xylenes were detected at MW-2 at concentrations of <br /> 1..3 and 1.4 parts per billion (ppb) respectively. <br /> Results of historical ground-water sampling at the site indicate <br /> that TPH and B EX concentrations have been declining since the <br /> initial sampling event in June, 1987. Benzene has historically <br /> been the petroleum constituents detected at the highest <br /> concentration at the site. Figure 3 (attached) :;bows hi:atorical <br /> benzene concentrations at site monitoring wells plotted against <br /> aampling dates. This figure illustrates a dramatic decline in <br /> benzene concentrations in monitoring wells at the site. Petroleum <br /> constituents have not been detected at monitoring wells MW-1, NW- <br /> 3, and MW-4 for a periodr exceeding 19 months. <br /> During the past two sampling events benzene has been detecte at <br /> monitoring well MW-2 at a maximum concentration of 1.3 ppm, a <br /> concentration only marginally higher than the California action . <br /> level of 1.0` ppb for this constituent. Examination of Figure 3 <br /> indicates that benzene concentrations at . MW-2 have declined <br /> dramatically since the initial sampling event in June, 1987. <br /> Resultsof the past two sampling events suggest that benzene <br /> concentrations at this well will likely. remain at very low or non- <br /> detectible concentrations. at this well. <br /> CONCLUBIONB AM- RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> In our professionaw opinion, the results of seven ground-water <br /> sampling events (over a period of 48 months) indicates that site <br /> activities have not posed a meaningful threat to ground-water <br /> resources beneath the site. Petroleum constituents are not present <br /> inground water beneath the site at concentrations that would <br /> normally require California's regional water duality control boards <br /> to call for remediation activities. <br /> Based on 'these conclusions we recommend that ground-water <br /> *monitoring activities at the site cease and that the San Joaquin <br /> County Public Health Services close the site in regard to further <br /> ground-water monitoring activities. <br />