Laserfiche WebLink
SOIL CONTAMINATION ASSESSMENT <br /> Lockeford Mini Hart <br /> NCA Project No, 10-90-104 <br /> Page 7 <br /> Comparison of the soil analytical data shown in Table 2 with the <br /> suggested maximum allowable BTXE and TPH concentrations shown in <br /> Table 3 for sites with a score of 48 points (the score assigned to <br /> this site) demonstrates that 12 of the 13 soil samples taken at the <br /> site have BTXE and TPH concentrations appreciably less than <br /> suggested allowable concentrations. The only soil sample that <br /> -- contained BTXE and TPH concentrations higher than those shown on <br /> Table 3 (for a site with a total score of 48) was sample T3N. Of <br /> constituents analyzed in this sample, only xylenes and TPH (2.1 and <br /> 390 ppm respectively) were detected at concentrations higher than <br /> the suggested concentrations (1 and 100 ppm respectively) . <br /> The score of 48 points assigned to this site is at the upper limit <br /> of the range of scores designated on Table 3 for allowable BTXE and <br /> TPH concentrations of .3, .3,1,1 and 100 ppm. Examination of Table <br /> 3 shows that the next category (with total scores of 49 or more) <br /> has allowable BTXE and TPH concentrations of 1,50,50,50, and 1000 <br /> ppm. These concentrations range from 3 to 166 times greater than <br /> the suggested concentrations for sites with 41.-48 points. In <br /> comparison to suggested allowable concentrations of BTXE and TPH <br /> for the bordering category (sites with a score of 49 or more) the <br /> concentrations of xylenes and TPH found in sample T3N are low. <br /> To better evaluate the potential threat (if any) to ground water <br /> posed by native soils in the vicinity of the tank basin it is <br /> instructive to examine ground-water analytical data (Appendix A) <br /> from monitoring wells MW-1 and MW-3, located adjacent to the tank <br /> basin (Figure 2) . Examination of this data shows that BTEX and TPH <br /> concentrations in these swells has historically been very low and <br /> has shown a marked decline since commencement of quarterly sampling <br /> at the site in June, 1987, Data from the August, 1989 sampling <br /> event shows no detected hydrocarbons in well MW--3 and no BTEX <br /> constituents detected in well MW--1. TPH was detected in well MW- <br /> 1 at a concentration of 25 ppb during the August, 1989 sampling <br /> event. <br /> 5.0 CONCLUSIONS RECOMMEIFAA�'}ONS <br /> Based on the low concentrations of petroleum constituents detected <br /> in soil samples from beneath the removed USTs and along product <br /> lines as well as the negligible concentrations of hydrocarbons <br /> detected in ground-water samples from monitoring wells MW-1 and <br /> MW-3 (located adjacent to the tank basin) it is our professional <br /> opinion that hydrocarbons remaining in site soils pose Little <br /> threat to ground water beneath the site. Based onthis,opinion,_-- <br /> - - ---we--believe-that--operation-of-the soil-venting system installed in <br /> the base of the tank excavation is not warranted at this time. <br />