My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012726
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
88 (STATE ROUTE 88)
>
13975
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0522057
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012726
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/20/2024 9:21:19 AM
Creation date
9/5/2019 2:44:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012726
RECORD_ID
PR0522057
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0015024
FACILITY_NAME
USA GASOLINE #3756
STREET_NUMBER
13975
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 88
City
LOCKEFORD
Zip
95237
APN
01908014
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
13975 E HWY 88
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
210
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Quarterly Ground-Water Monitoring October 4, 1989 <br /> Beacon Station No. 22-1, L.ockeford, California AGS 87048-2 <br /> slopes slightly to.ths west. We understand from Sharbob personnel that the dry wells were <br /> destroye.within a month after th_— sampling. <br /> Groundwater monitoring was also conducted in October 1987, April 1988, and July 1988 <br /> (Applied GeoSystems Report 87048-2, November 17, 1987, June 7, 1988, and October 25, <br /> 1988). These later monitoring events have indicated lower levels of ground-water <br /> contamination in all four wells.. The.highest level of hydrocarbon contamination is.still in <br /> well MW-2 which further.suggests drainage into the former dry wells may.have been the <br /> source of hydrocarbon contamination:. <br /> At the request of Sharbob, a geologist from our office was at the site on August 2, 1989, <br /> to collect ground-water samples from the four wells. The depth to the ground-water surface <br /> was measured and the water.was subjectively analyzed in each monitoring well using <br /> methods outlined in the Field Procedures attached to this letter report. The total depth of <br /> each well was also measured. Cumulative results of subjective analyses are summarized in <br /> Table 1. No floating product or product sheen was noted in the wells. Ground water was <br /> found to be approximately 3 feet deeper than previously measured. <br /> Ground water from each monitoring well was purged and sampled by methods outlined in <br /> the Field Procedures attached to this letter report. The field geologist initiated a Chain of <br /> Custody Record and it accompanied the samples to the analytical laboratory. A copy of <br /> that record is attached to this letter report. <br /> The groundwater samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) using <br /> Environmental Protection Agency(EPA) Method 8015 and benzene,toluene,ethylbenzene, <br /> ® and total xylene isomers (BTEX) using EPA Method 602 at the Applied GeoSystems <br /> laboratory in Fremont, California, (Hazardous Waste Testing Laboratory Certificate No. <br /> 153). Cumulative results of laboratory analyses ar- summarized in Table 2. Copies of the <br /> laboratory Analysis Reports are attached to this letter report. <br /> Laboratory results of water samples from well MW-2 indicate the TPH concentration <br /> increased from 0.52 ppm to 1.1 ppm since the last sampling in July 1988. The benzene <br /> concentration increased from 0.0354 ppm to 9.039 ppm. The drinking water standard set <br /> by the California Department of Health Services(DHS)for benzene is 0.001 ppm. Toluene <br /> and total xylene isomers increased approximately 0.001 ppm. The ethylbenzene <br /> concentration decreased from 0.0034 ppm to.0.0015 ppm. .Laboratory, ,results of water <br /> samples from wells MVEJ:.1;MW-3,and MW-4 indicate TPH and BTEX levels are below the <br /> detection levels for the tests used except for the TPIt level in well MW-1 which was 0,025 <br /> ppm <br /> df <br /> The ground-water gradient was evaluated to provide an indication of the- erection o <br /> groundwater flow at the site. Differences in height among the tops of the well casings were <br /> 2 _ <br /> AVP/led 0e0SYWOMS — <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.