Laserfiche WebLink
The mound may rise to a depth of: 8.0 ft minus 0.67 ft rise of mound = 7.33 ft below grade. For <br /> wastewater treatment (destruction of bacteria and viruses) to occur,the distance effluent should travel <br /> under unsaturated conditions through the soil environment is generally regarded to be 5 feet. <br /> In the Finnemore and Hantzsche paper, they discuss three options to consider as potential methods of <br /> reducing the mounding phenomenon. The first is increasing the size of the disposal field. Based <br /> upon the average daily flow calculations found on Page 12, it is anticipated that the disposal area is <br /> sufficient in size to accommodate the projected flow volumes after complete build-out. The disposal <br /> area is based on mathematical computations for sizing found in the S.J.C. Sewage Standards and <br /> EHD parameters. The second method is elongating the shape of the area covered by the field. As <br /> noted on the design plans, the filter bed is elongated in a 3.3:1 length-to-width ratio. Additionally, the <br /> long axis of the filter bed is oriented toward the northeast. This orientation is perpendicular to the <br /> groundwater flow direction as observed in the on-site monitoring wells. Discussions in the scientific <br /> literature suggest that rectangular disposal area orientations perpendicular to groundwater flow may <br /> reduce the propensity for mound formation. Thirdly, operating the field intermittently should <br /> decrease the mounding effect. As noted in the filter bed design, there are two separate filter bed <br /> disposal areas. Effluent will be pumped by two separate pumps that will alternate between the two <br /> filter beds, thus creating intermittent dosing of each bed. <br /> If it is determined at some point in the future, that mounding effects are preventing proper effluent <br /> treatment and disposal, the area designated as the 100%replacement area may have to be activated. <br /> This reserve area is located northwest of the primary disposal area. This may occur prior to attaining <br /> the projected 2,180 gpd effluent flow volumes after the phased completion and full occupancy,but <br /> can be considered unlikely. <br /> E. �URFACE WATER INFORMATION <br /> The surface water retention pond for the existing and�ure development of the project will beat the <br /> southern end of the project, as denoted on Site Plans. There should be no im oundment <br /> water from the proposed filter bed due to a separation distance of approximately 157eiter <br /> ee <br /> Depending on the directional flow upper groundwater aquifers, the retention pon is upgradient <br /> or crossgradient to the future filter bed. Regardless of groundwater directional flow,percolating <br /> rainwater from the basin into the top aquifer mixing layer may create a dilution effect to the <br /> percolating septic system effluent. <br /> However, this can only be truly discerned with complicated groundwater monitoring and modeling. <br /> According to a scientific paper authored by Shaw and Turyk(1994),reduction of nitrate <br /> concentrations in groundwater can occur primarily through dispersion, or by percolating rainwater <br /> recharge. <br /> Climatic Dat&: Rainfall rsus Evapotranspiration <br /> NLS§3.2 It is enerall d scientifically accepted that when precipitation exceeds evapotrans- <br /> piration(Eto), deep percolation of surface rainwater impoundment may occur. Evapotranspiration <br /> refers to water evaporation that takes place both at the soil surface and transpiration by plants, and is <br /> defined as water loss from a large field of 4-to-7 inch tall, cool-season grass that is not water stressed. <br /> 9 <br /> Chesney Consulting <br />