Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Kim Tarbell <br /> September 16, 1996 <br /> Page 3 <br /> 1 to 3 miles of the project site(San Joaquin County Community Development Department. 1993. <br /> Habitat conservation plan. San Joaquin kit fox in western San Joaquin County. Preliminary draft. <br /> June 25, 1993. Stockton,CA). EIP Associates accepted as reliable a kit fox observation at the Tracy <br /> Airport approximately 1 mile from the project site but was unable to locate any active dens during <br /> subsequent searches(Beeman G. A. Wildlife biologist. Private consultant, Lafayette,CA. May 16, <br /> 1991 -meeting; May 10 and 15 and June 5, 1991 and February 15, 1993 -telephone conversations). <br /> EIP Associates(Mullen, D. Project manager. EIP Associates, San Francisco, CA. July 17, 1992 - <br /> telephone conversation) also recorded small canid tracks it considered to be kit fox tracks at the <br /> intersection of Linne Road and Tracy Boulevard,approximately 1 mile northwest of the project site, <br /> but did not find any active dens after den searches. <br /> Jones & Stokes Associates conducted USFWS protocol-level surveys for San Joaquin kit <br /> foxes in 1993 at what is now the Tracy Materials Recovery and Transfer Facility on MacArthur <br /> Drive just south of the 156-acre orchard. Jones& Stokes Associates concluded that kit foxes were <br /> not denning or foraging onsite and that although the project site was near an area where kit foxes had <br /> been observed,kit foxes either did not use the project site or did so only infrequently. Because the <br /> project site was small and isolated from other suitable potential kit fox habitat(on the west side of <br /> Highway 580),Jones& Stokes Associates concluded this site was not essential to maintain kit fox <br /> individuals or populations that may occur nearby. <br /> Other Special-Status Species <br /> Jones& Stokes Associates did not observe any special-status plant or wildlife species during <br /> the survey. In addition, the Traina property consists entirely of orchards which do not provide <br /> important habitat for any special-status species. Orchards may provide temporary roosting habitat <br /> for the state, fully protected, white-tailed kite (Elanus caeruleus);but this habitat is not limited to <br /> the project area and its loss would not affect local populations of white-tailed kites. Orchards are <br /> not considered suitable habitat for the Swainson's hawk or the showy Indian clover. Biologists did <br /> not observe burrowing owls which could occur around the orchard perimeter in bermed areas but <br /> these areas would be protected by the proposed buffer around the mining area. <br /> Conclusions <br /> There were no potential or active kit fox dens or any positive sign of kit foxes within the <br /> proposed mining area. The one potential den was located outside of the proposed mining area and <br /> would not be disturbed by the proposed mining operation. <br /> The loss of 156 acres of orchard habitat on the Trains property would not affect kit fox <br /> denning or foraging habitat. Based on our recent surveys and those conducted nearby in 1993, <br /> Jones & Stokes Associates, Inc. <br /> �. 2600 V Street,Suite 100•Sacramento,CA 95818-1914•Fax 916/737-3030.916/737-3000 <br />