Laserfiche WebLink
rV. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> he soil physical characteristics under the proposed wastewater disposal area reveal permeable soils <br /> i�n the upper and in the lower horizons. The upper soils within the profile contain a higher-than- <br /> expected clay content of 10%. This should be a sufficient clay content to impede saturated flow <br /> conditions of percolating effluent and provide biological wastewater treatment. <br /> The wastewater disposal system has been designed based on comparable wastewater flow volume <br /> data from a similar facility, correlated with the soil test results. The infiltration rate of 8.5 minutes <br /> per inch obtained from the Double Ring Infiltrometer test is equivalent to an effluent acceptance rate <br /> of 0.857 gals/ftz/day, as published in various scientific literature (e.g., California SWRCB Guidelines <br /> for the Design. Installation and Operation of Mound Sewage Disposal Systems.) <br /> Since the project will be on a flowmeter, average wastewater flow volumes can be easily calculated <br /> on a daily, weekly or monthly basis. Time intervals will be stipulated by EHD. As referenced <br /> above, the maximum daily flow of 1,000 gpd has been used for mounding analysis, nitrate loading <br /> calculations and filter bed sizing. If it is determined in the future that the average daily,/low <br /> exceeds this figure, there is more than ample area to enlarge the filter bed, along with additional <br /> replacement area. These areas are shown on the portion of the Site Plan illustrating the filter bed <br /> orientation. <br /> Certain appurtenances change the characteristics of the wastewater effluent such as filters within the <br /> septic tank and kitchen food-waste grinders. An effluent filter must be installed. If there is to be a <br /> kitchen or food processing facility within any of the proposed buildings, disposals or food waste <br /> grinders should not be used. <br /> It is imperative that no chemicals, solvents or petroleum products, other than very low concentrations <br /> of household cleaners be introduced into the septic system. Additionally, if there is to be any food <br /> production,preparation or processing facility in any of the buildings anytime in the future, a grease <br /> trap (interceptor tank) may have to be installed before this waste stream enters the septic tanks. <br /> It is important to recognize that all wastewater disposal systems and disposal areas have a lifespan. <br /> This lifespan is unpredictable due to the numerous operational and environmental factors involved. <br /> Clean-outs have been specified at the distal ends of the laterals. By using a long "bottle-brush" <br /> arrangement, the interiors of the laterals can be cleaned of biological slime build-up. <br /> Biomat buildup that will occur within the gravel bed and particularly at the soil/effluent interface is a <br /> naturally occurring process that is typically managed by allowing the filter bed to rest and <br /> rehabilitate naturally. Biomat decomposition may be accelerated by pumping air into the disposal <br /> system piping of a resting filter bed. <br /> It is conservatively estimated that the landscape grass cover over the filter bed area will take up <br /> approximately 30% of the effluent and consequently 30%the nitrogen from the Business Park <br /> project. Using an average daily flow estimate of 1,000 gpd and a nitrogen concentration of 88 mg <br /> N/L (See Page 8), we have the following landscape grass water needs and nitrogen concentrations <br /> theoretically absorbed by the grass, after the Business Park is completely built-out: <br /> The following Worksheet is found in A Guide to Estimating Irrigation Water Needs of Landscape <br /> Page -11- <br /> Chesney Consuhing <br />