My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0003074
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MADRUGA
>
200
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
SA-93-42
>
SU0003074
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/7/2020 11:29:39 AM
Creation date
9/6/2019 9:58:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0003074
PE
2633
FACILITY_NAME
SA-93-42
STREET_NUMBER
200
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
MADRUGA
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LATHROP
ENTERED_DATE
11/6/2001 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
200 E MADRUGA RD
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\M\MADRUGA\200\SA-93-42\SU0003074\APPL.PDF \MIGRATIONS\M\MADRUGA\200\SA-93-42\SU0003074\CDD OK.PDF \MIGRATIONS\M\MADRUGA\200\SA-93-42\SU0003074\EH COND.PDF \MIGRATIONS\M\MADRUGA\200\SA-93-42\SU0003074\MISC.PDF
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
85
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
U <br /> Strangio and Associates <br /> CIVIL& ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS <br /> 1789 COTTLE AVE. <br /> SAN JOSE. CA 95125 - <br /> (408) 978-9604 FAX (408) 448-5284 <br /> October 26 , 1993 <br /> Ms. Kerry Sullivan <br /> .� <br /> San Joaquin County 3 <br /> 3199 <br /> Community Development GQ MUry')r UCrcLL, 9 <br /> 1810 E. Hazelton <br /> Stockton, Ca. 95205 -LANNINGDIyISID),y y` <br /> Dear Ms. Sullivan: <br /> In response to your query relative to the type of process <br /> that will be used at the City of Lathrop wastewater treatment <br /> plant and how would it be any different then two plants that <br /> you have personal experience with that are odorous(frequently in <br /> one case, and less frequently in another case) . <br /> A comparison of the three plants' would show that each plant had a <br /> different arrangement of processes which were used to stabilize <br /> their waste streams. However the two smelly plants use both aerobic <br /> and anaerobic processes(sludge digesters) while Lathrops' uses only <br /> aerobic processes. This is significant because anaerobic processes <br /> produce odors which most people characterize as being "smelly and <br /> disgusting" . The sludge digesters are used because they can <br /> produce methane gas which is used on-site to save energy, and they <br /> "hydrolyze" ( ie liquidize) solid material. The control of that <br /> process is not easy, plus the liquid is produced is very smelly. <br /> When the liquid is returned to the main treatment system there is <br /> ample opportunity for the smell to escape to the atmosphere. <br /> Lathrop will avoid this problem by using the aerobic stabilization <br /> inherent in the activated sludge process that is being used at that <br /> site. <br /> If you have the time it .would be worthwhile for you to visit the <br /> City of Hughson plant in nearby Hughson. This plant has won "The <br /> treatment plant of the Year" award four times. The process is <br /> similar to Lathrops, however it is not quite as sophisticated as <br /> Lathrop, since Lathrops also has a nutrient control process. <br /> Hughson's plant was built because the previous plant had such bad <br /> odors that a "Cease and Desist Order" was imposed. There have been <br /> no troubles since the new plant came on line. <br /> Specifically why the other plants are odorous is the result of the <br /> processes which are used and certain other factors. The plant to <br /> the west of Lathrop utilizes a "trickling filter" to oxidize the <br /> waste water. This process can be characterized as the minimum, or <br /> low end treatment process which will satisfy the Federal criteria <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.