SU0009099 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Master Plan or SPII amendments related to transportation are proposed by the project and no conflicts with these policy documents have been identified. Air Quality and Transportation Management. This chapter of the Master Plan addresses both the protection of air quality and the need for a Transportation Demand Management (TDM)program for the overall community. Air quality is addressed in Section 5.3 of this Initial Study. No major conflicts with this chapter of the Master Plan have been identified, and no policy changes for this topic are proposed by the applicant. Noise. This chapter of the Master Plan addresses mobile and stationary noise sources at Mountain House.The project does not propose any amendments to this chapter of the Master Plan, and no major conflicts with Master Plan policy have been identified. Potable Water Systems. This chapter of the Master Plan addresses water supply, water demand,water treatment, and water storage. Section 5.16, Utilities and Service Systems,of this Initial Study addresses water issues. No amendments are proposed for this chapter of the Master Plan and no policy conflicts have been identified. Wastewater Treatment and Collection System. This chapter of the Master Plan addresses wastewater generation and collection, treatment, sludge disposal, odors, and costs/permits. No amendments are proposed for this chapter of the Master Plan. This topic is covered in Section 5.16, Utilities and Service Systems, of this Initial Study. No policy conflicts have been identified. Storm Drainage and Flood Protection. The issue of storm drainage is addressed in Section 5.8, Hydrology and Water Quality, of this Initial Study. No amendments are proposed for this chapter of the Master Plan. No policy conflicts have been identified. `. Public Financing Plan Consistency The Master Plan requires that each discretionary Development Permit approval be consistent with the Public Financing Plan. The Mountain House Public Financing Plan sets forth principals and policies with which discretionary development approvals within the community must be consistent. Considerable fiscal and financial analysis has been prepared since the initial Public Financing Plan was approved to ensure that, as development occurs, mechanisms are in place to implement the objectives of the Public Financing Plan. The proposed project will be subject to the impact fees, monthly charges and special taxes that have been adopted to provide funding for the public facilities and services that are required to serve new development. Specifically, the proposed project is consistent with the Public Financing Plan for the following reasons: 1. Development within the Town Center would finance the pro-rata cost of infrastructure needed to serve them, through a combination of impact fees, monthly utility charges, special taxes and MHCSD special taxes. 2. Development would pay the cost of mitigating impacts on existing facilities, infrastructure and the environment. 3. Infrastructure costs would be allocated to properties within the project based on the principle of benefit received. 4. Mechanisms have been established to assure timely construction of public improvements, dedication of necessary public lands and rights-of-way, and reimbursement of disproportionate costs. The revenues generated to the County from development of the Town Center would offset the cost of public services to ensure that the project has a positive fiscal impact on the County. 3