Laserfiche WebLink
n <br /> The infiltration tests were done at approximately 12 inches below the ground surface on the <br /> aforementioned plow pan layer. This depth represents a potential soil-effluent interface if the <br /> wastewater disposal system is installed at a high elevation in relation to the soil surface. The <br /> annular spaces were presaturated with 12 inches of water the day before testing. No soil cracking <br /> was observed in the soil surface. When the soil becomes saturated, infiltration slows <br /> considerably. This is evident on the Infiltration Test Form found in Appendix 4 in which there <br /> was an initial, large influx of water(500 cc 24 hours after pre-saturation), and then a steady <br /> decline of water infiltration after every 30 minutes. The double ring infiltration test results are <br /> summarized below: <br /> TABLE 4 <br /> . 'Y�,_,,4NFILTRATION:1 EST RESULTS` - <br /> IINFILTRATION RATE IN <br /> CM/HR,CM/SEC AND MINAN <br /> r <br /> 1.79 cm/hr, 0.000497 cm/sec, 85.1 min/in <br /> 2.4 Soil Chemical Test Results <br /> Chemical analytical assessment of the subsurface soils was done on the samples at the respective depths,retrieved <br /> from the two 15 ft.perc test borings. The test results are noted on the Soil Analysis Reports in Appendix 5. This <br /> chemistry was done to analyze the primary constituents that influence nitrate loading; specifically adsorption, <br /> nitrification and denitrification. The important soil parameters for nitrate assessment are the organic matter,pH, <br /> cation exchange capacity(CEC),and indigenous nitrate-nitrogen content. As noted from the test results,the <br /> organic matter within the soil profile is low. Thenitrate-nitrogen contents low-to-low consistent <br /> nitrogen concentration throughout the soil profile in the NEC at an averaC of 4.5 pp (does not exceed 10 ppm as <br /> NO,-N). The SWC soil tests show a higher nitrate-nitrogen concentratiddn through soil profile in comparison to <br /> the NEC samples at approxi telt'2x fortlie and 5 ft test samples, an proximately 3.5x for the 10 ft and 15 <br /> ft samples. Although eq i g soil nitrate-ni ,{egen ontent vados water content is difficult,the nitrogen <br /> cone trafion in the SWC t 9 ppm11111 ppm, 9 pp an pp ay indicat the possibility that greater than 10 <br /> p NO,-N�ould exist in e vad9he zone w t ese concen ations c considered low-to-medium for soils <br /> t tt have-Keen under past agn ultiival pra'c ces. <br /> Since septic tank effluent is composed predominately of ammonium(NH,),the pH, along with the CEC,have <br /> influence on ammonium molecules. The pH of the soil profile is alkaline with all samples above 8.0,except for the <br /> 10 ft depth in the SWC test area,which had a pH of 7.9(and the highest N0,-N content at 19 ppm). This pH <br /> i profile may have a defined suppression effect on nitrate formation(nitrification)by affecting molecular ammonium <br /> stability. Secondly,nitrate that does form,alkaline environments may increase the potential for denitrification. <br /> The CEC measures the ability of the soil to theoretically trap and hold ammonium molecules, thus having an <br /> influence on suppression of nitrification;however, from the test results,there appears to be little correlation <br /> between CEC and nitrogen concentration. <br /> Given that the SWC soils of the disposal area have a higher nitrate-nitrogen concentration than the NEC soils,it is <br /> theorized that these concentrations throughout the SWC soil profile may be much greater that what was observed if <br /> the referenced soil parameters that influence, and may suppress nitrification were not occurring. The following <br /> Table illustrates and summarizes the encountered soil profile characteristics,along with the analytical test results <br /> for comparison purposes: <br /> Page -9- <br /> Chesney Consulting <br />