Laserfiche WebLink
Within the text of this Report, Bolded Section (§) numbers are referenced at the beginning of an <br /> applicable Paragraph or Paragraphs, Appendix or Table of Contents that correspond with the EHD <br /> Requirements Checklist. Section Numbers referenced as SSS§, are sections applicable for the <br /> Soil Suitability Study Requirements Checklist. Section Numbers referenced as NLS§, are <br /> sections applicable for the Nitrate Loading Study Requirements Checklist. Other portions of <br /> text may also apply to other sections of the Checklists. <br /> II. SOIL SUITABILITY STUDY FINDINGS <br /> A. SUBJECT PROPERTY AND SURROUNDING STUDY AREA INFORMATION <br /> SSS§ 1.1 Surrounding land use,particularly to the south,west and north of the project is, and has <br /> been, in agricultural production for many decades. New development within the City of Lathrop is <br /> occurring approximately three miles to the south, and is projected to proceed north along the west <br /> side of Interstate 5. As noted on the San Joaquin County Parcel Viewer Maps,the current <br /> surrounding land use is composed primarily of agricultural production land to the north, south and <br /> west. To the east is Interstate 5, the City of Lathrop, and commercial facilities, all of which are on <br /> decentralized wastewater management systems. The property is zoned I-L, Limited Industrial. <br /> SSS§3.1, 3.2,3.3,3.4,3.5,3.6 Applications on microfiche file with the EHD reveal that there have <br /> been three permits issued for repairs/additions to existing systems within a one-half mile surrounding <br /> the project site. No septic system permits for the installation of the original on-site system for the <br /> Hayres Egg Ranch were found. Permits in this specific area of San Joaquin County would be few <br /> since County land to the north, south and west of the site is sparsely developed. <br /> The project site has relatively level terrain; consequently, there will be no need to incorporate design <br /> considerations for slopes within the two filter bed areas. Nor are there dramatic elevational <br /> differences between the new office building or the office trailers and the disposal field areas. <br /> B. SOIL PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND ANALYTICAL TEST RESULTS <br /> The United States Department of Agriculture - Soil Conservation Service(USDA-SCS) indicates the <br /> majority of the on-site soils to consist of a Manteca fine sandy loam(#196), with the extreme <br /> northeast corner of the property composed of Veritas fine sandy loam(#266). <br /> SSS§ 5.2 The surface and subsurface soil investigation and testing began with drilling a 20 feet <br /> deep boring with a truck-mounted drill rig in the proposed VLF and ELF locations. Soil samples <br /> were retrieved in five foot intervals with a split-spoon sampler. These three deep borings provided: <br /> 1.) A profile of the underlying soil characteristics, 2.) Depth to groundwater,which was found to be <br /> approximately 13 feet below grade for the ELF and 11 feet below grade for the WLF, 3.) Saturated <br /> formation (first aquifer)material type, analyzed to be of differing soil types as illustrated in Table 1 <br /> below, and 4.) A water table sample for analysis. Rust mottling was observed in both of these <br /> borings at the ten-foot depth that indicates seasonal soil saturation. Soil saturation may be beneficial <br /> for the promotion of denitrification potential. <br /> 3 <br /> Chesney Consulting <br />