Laserfiche WebLink
Farea <br /> nnemore and Hantzsche paper, they discuss three options to consider as potential methods of <br /> the mounding phenomenon. The first is increasing the size of the disposal field. Based <br /> average daily flow calculations found on Page 14, it is anticipated the disposal area is <br /> t in size to accommodate the projected flow volumes after complete build-out. The disposal <br /> ased on mathematical computations for sizing found in the S.J.C. Sewage Standards and <br /> EHD parameters. <br /> The second method is elongating the shape of the area covered by the disposal field. As noted on the <br /> design plans, the filter bed is elongated in a 9.5:1 length-to-width ratio. Thirdly, operating the field <br /> intermittently should decrease the mounding effect. As noted in the filter bed design,there are two <br /> separate filter bed disposal areas. Effluent will be pumped by two separate pumps that will alternate <br /> between the two filter beds, thus creating intermittent dosing of each bed. <br /> If it is determined at some point in the future, that mounding effects are preventing proper effluent <br /> treatment and disposal, the area designated as the 100%replacement areas may have to be activated. <br /> These reserve areas are located directly to the east and to the south of the primary disposal area for the <br /> ELF, and to the south and west for the WLF. Activation of the 100%reserve area may occur prior to <br /> attaining the projected 1,586 gpd effluent flow volumes after the phased completion and full <br /> occupancy. However, this can be considered unlikely. <br /> E. SURFACE WATER INFORMATION <br /> The surface water retention pond for the existing and future development of the project will be at the <br /> southern end of the project, as denoted on the Site Plans. There should be no impact to impoundment <br /> water from the proposed two filter beds due to a separation distance of approximately 220 feet from <br /> the WLF and over 800 from the ELF. Depending on the directional flow of the upper groundwater <br /> aquifers, the retention pond is either upgradient or crossgradient to the future filter bed. If the <br /> groundwater directional flow is northeast,percolating rainwater from the basin into the top aquifer <br /> mixing layer may create a dilution effect to the downgradient percolating septic system effluent. <br /> Groundwater dilution affects can only be truly discerned with complicated groundwater monitoring <br /> and modeling. According to a scientific paper authored by Shaw and Turyk(1994),reduction of <br /> nitrate concentrations in groundwater can occur primarily through dispersion, or by percolating <br /> rainwater recharge. <br /> Climatic Data: Rainfall versus Evapotranspiration <br /> NLS§3.2 It is generally and scientifically accepted that when precipitation exceeds evapotrans- <br /> piration(Eto), deep percolation of surface rainwater may occur. Evapotranspiration refers to water <br /> evaporation that takes place both at the soil surface and transpiration by plants, and is defined as <br /> water loss from a large field of 4-to-7 inch tall, cool-season grass that is not water stressed. <br /> The following chart illustrates rainfall and evapotranspiration for the Stockton area. Precipitation <br /> data was obtained from the Soil Survey of San Joaquin County. The conservative"2 years in 10"data <br /> was used and not the"average rainfall'data. Evapotranspiration data was obtained from the <br /> California Irrigation Management Information System (CIMIS): <br /> 11 <br /> Chesney Consulting <br />